It has been a few weeks since my last legislative update, and while quite a bit has happened during the interim, I’m going to brief everyone today on two major updates to topics you’ve no doubt read about quite a bit over the years: transparency and the No Surprises Act (NSA) independent dispute resolution (IDR) process.
First, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently issued a new request for information (RFI), FAQs, and guidance related to transparency requirements for health plans and healthcare price transparency in general. This was done in response to President Trump’s February Executive Order (EO) titled “Making America Healthy Again by Empowering Patients with Clear, Accurate, and Actionable Healthcare Pricing Information (try saying that three times fast!) As we reported at the time, this February EO was an “extension,” if you will, to President Trump’s first-term transparency-focused EO that initially required hospitals to publicly post standard charge information. The most recent EO referenced the previous requirements and added that agencies should take all necessary action to implement “the promise of radical transparency.”
Turning back to the CMS new announcements, the agency published an RFI to inform future rulemaking and guidance on how best to improve prescription drug price transparency, as well as implement the prescription drug machine-readable file (MRF) requirements for health plans. Just as a reminder, CMS has thus far deferred enforcement of those requirements, so it looks like that might be coming in the future.
The agency also released FAQs related to its intended release of revised technical requirements for health plans’ in-network and out-of-network MRFs. This new version will require the exclusion of duplicative data, reduce unnecessary data fields, and include updates to better contextualize the data.
The FAQs also mention that CMS is considering rulemaking to improve the health plans’ MRF requirements as a whole.
And finally, CMS released updated guidance on hospital price transparency and hospitals’ requirements to display standard charges. The guidance clarified that hospitals are required to encode a standard charge dollar amount in the hospital MRFs, not estimates, and also provides updated instructions on calculating the estimated allowed amounts for services.
These publications were reportedly done in service of the February EO, as well as President Trump’s commitment to using healthcare data to “curb rising health care costs, promote competition, and empower patients.”
But this wasn’t the only big news out of Washington this week. Well, technically, this story is out of New Orleans…but regardless, it was an unexpected turn of events in the ongoing journey of the NSA lawsuit known as TMA (Texas Medical Association) III. The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a rare rehearing of the TMA III case before the entire court.
TMA III specifically deals with how health plans calculate the qualifying payment amount (QPA). Plaintiffs argued that final rules from the federal government on the NSA’s dispute resolution process allow plans to artificially depress the QPA, which allegedly would tilt the dispute resolution process in favor of the payer. Frequent readers may recall that a three-judge panel of 5th Circuit judges ruled mostly in favor of the federal government in the case, which was an appeal from a Texas district court, last fall.
It was a rare win for the federal government in the series of TMA cases. TMA asked that the appeal be completely reheard before the full court, instead of a panel, which the court has now agreed to do. Initial scheduling indicates that the case will be eligible to go before the court again in the fall, and it’s anyone’s guess whether the full court will come to a similar conclusion of their colleagues’ initial decision, or grant TMA a new victory.
So, it’s a little bit like two steps forward, one step back for the federal government right now. While the administration has taken these significant steps forward in advancing transparency, the courts have given it a pause – at least for now.
What’s certain is that it’s sure to be an extremely busy fall.
Programming Note: Listen live to Monitor Monday with Chuck Buck, 10 Eastern, to hear the “Legislative Update” sponsored by Zelis.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
In the last six weeks, my colleagues and I have dealt with two situations in which clinics either missed or did not receive the orange
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
