Failing a TPE audit can result in onerous actions.
Healthcare audits have now resumed to 100-percent capacity – or even 150 percent. All audits that were suspended during COVID have been reinstated.
As you all know, Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) and Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) audits were reinstated back in August. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) then announced that Targeted Probe-and-Educate (TPE) audits would resume on Sept. 1. Unlike RAC audits, the stated goal of TPE audits is to help providers reduce claim denials and appeals with one-on-one education, focused on the documentation and coding of the services they provide. However, do not let that fool you. Failing a TPE audit can result in onerous actions such as 100-percent prepay review, extrapolation, referral to a RAC, or other remediation, so a carefully crafted response to a TPE audit is critical. TPEs can be prepay or post-pay.
Speaking of prepayments, these too are back in full swing. CareSource is one of the companies contracted with CMS to conduct prepayment reviews, and urgent care centers seem to be a target. Prepayment review is technically and legally not a penalty; therefore, being placed on prepayment review is not appealable. But do not put too much stock in that – prepay is draconian in nature and puts many providers out of business, especially if they fail to seek legal counsel immediately, believing that they will pass without any problem. When it comes to prepayments, believing that everything will be OK, is a death trap. Instead, get a big stick.
42 CFR §447.45 requires 90 percent of clean claims to be paid to a provider within 30 days of receipt. Ninety-nine percent must be paid within 90 days. The same regulations mandate that each agency conduct prepayment review of claims to ensure that the claims are not duplicative, that the consumer is eligible for Medicare, and/or that the number of visits and services delivered are logically consistent with the beneficiary’s characteristics and circumstances, such as type of illness, age, sex, and service location. This standard prepayment review is dissimilar from a true prepayment review.
Chapter 3 of the Medicare Program Integrity Manual lays out the rules for a prepayment review audit. The Manual states that MACs shall deal with serious problems using the most substantial administrative actions available, such as 100-percent prepayment review of claims. Minor or isolated inappropriate billing shall be remediated through provider notification or feedback, with reevaluation after notification. The new prepay review rules comments closed on Sept. 13, so they will take effect soon.
If a 100-percent prepay is considered the most substantial administrative action, then why is it not considered an appealable sanction? I have, however, been successful in obtaining an injunction enjoining the suspension of payments without appealing being placed on prepay.
When requesting documentation for prepayment review, the MACs and Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPICs) shall notify providers when they expect documentation to be received. It is normally 30 days. The Manual does not allow for extensions to providers who need more time to comply. Reviewers shall deny claims when the requested documentation to support payment is not received by the expected timeframe.
Any audit, but especially prepay audits, can lead to termination under 42 CFR §424.535.
Remember, you may choose to speak softly, but always carry a big stick.
Programming Note: Listen to healthcare attorney Knicole Emanuel’s RAC Report every Monday on Monitor Mondays, 10 a.m. EST.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Ritesh Ramesh, CEO for MDaudit, appeared on Monitor Monday to report his company’s findings on nationwide audit trends. The rate of payer audits
The Medicare audit landscape has undergone a fundamental transformation, evolving from ad hoc enforcement practices to scientifically rigorous methodological frameworks. This evolution spans two critical
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
