There’s a good chance frequent Monitor Monday listeners have heard me discuss the four Texas Medical Association (TMA) lawsuits at least once over the last few years.
The lawsuits challenge various parts of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) final rules implementing the No Surprises Act (NSA). A district court in Texas ruled in favor of TMA and the provider plaintiffs in all four cases, and the Biden Administration has appealed two of those rulings.
Well, after over a year, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled on the first of the two appeals, and handed yet another victory to TMA.
Now, it’s easy to get these lawsuits confused, so let me provide a small refresher of what was at stake here. The second TMA suit was initially filed in 2022, after CMS released final rules implementing the NSA independent dispute resolution (IDR) process. TMA argued that parts of the rules conflicted with the actual statute of the NSA by requiring arbitrators to weight the qualifying payment amount (QPA) more heavily than other factors in the IDR process, which “unfairly advantaged health insurers.”
The organization also alleged that the rules improperly created prerequisites that had to be met before non-QPA factors could even be considered. The district court agreed, and the Biden Administration appealed that decision.
After hearing both sides’ oral arguments back in February, the 5th Circuit took six months to consider whether the Biden Administration overstepped its bounds in its final rules – and ultimately concluded that it did.
The court looked at several issues related to the appeal, a few of which I’ll touch on here.
First, it found that the Biden Administration has only narrow rulemaking authority in regards to the NSA, and went “a lily pad too far” by jumping from the administrative authority it was given by Congress in the NSA to filling in gaps in the arbitration process itself.
Second, it found that the Biden Administration exceeded its authority because the NSA does not have any language specifying the order factors that must be considered in the IDR process, or that other factors should be considered less than the QPA.
Third, the court found that the Administrative Procedure Act does indeed authorize courts to vacate agency actions, and that doing so in this case would not be overly disruptive.
Interestingly, the Supreme Court’s recent overturning of the Chevron deference standard in Loper Bright was technically considered, as both sides filed documents related to the change in precedent. These documents argued why the case supported or didn’t change the validity of their argument. This is one of the first lawsuits regarding agency action to be ruled upon, post-Loper.
So, what does this mean going forward? Well, technically, not much, immediately. The provisions at issue here were vacated back with the initial ruling, so things have been operating more or less pursuant to this latest ruling for quite some time.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was contacted for comment after the decision came out, but thus far has declined. Many have suggested that the agency might pause the IDR process to update the rules pursuant to this decision, but the Administration’s NSA website has not yet been updated in any way.
TMA has stated that with this fifth victory in court, they “hope this resolves the issue once and for all” on what Congress intended. While they do remain undefeated in court, the Biden Administration has one more chance when it argues its appeal of the third TMA suit before the court early next month.
All may be quiet for now, but it won’t stay that way for long.
Here are my thoughts on what to expect when the federal shutdown finally ends. First, the lights don’t all flick back on at once. Agencies
As this year’s federal government shutdown is crowned the longest in history, we’re finally seeing progress towards a reopening. This weekend the Senate voted 60-40
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
