As a provider, a question worth asking yourself these days is this: what degree of risk is there that you might have something on your website that could lead to a multi-million-dollar class-action lawsuit and a determination by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) that you violated the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)?
As anyone who has seen the pop-up banners on many websites over the past few years knows, websites often use “cookies,” small packets of data, to track activities on the site. Sometimes, these cookies also share information with third parties.
Social media and online ad companies provide some of the most common cookies and other tracking tools to website owners. “Meta Pixel,” provided by Meta – Facebook’s parent company – and Google Analytics are among the most ubiquitous. But nearly every social media company, such as LinkedIn, Snapchat, TikTok, Twitter-slash-X, offers something.
These cookies are often used to figure out how effective advertising campaigns and websites are at driving people to sites and then prompting them to take certain actions, such as buying a product – or, potentially, making an appointment with a doctor.
In the process, these tools often send information back to a third party, such as Meta or Google.
And here’s where OCR and some plaintiffs think there might be a problem.
In the past year, dozens of class-action lawsuits have been filed against healthcare entities because of their websites’ use of Meta Pixel and other tools. We have four in federal court just here in Minnesota, where I am.
So far, these lawsuits have mostly targeted hospital systems. But they are starting to target smaller entities. For example, one was recently filed against a small clinic in Florida.
The central claim is that healthcare entities cannot share information people provide on their websites. Tracking technologies do that.
So, what’s the risk?
An older, similar case settled for $18.4 million.
One of the newer cases settled about a month ago for more than $12 million.
But on the other hand, federal courts have also dismissed (or mostly dismissed) several cases in the last few months.
Because these lawsuits are so new, it’s hard to say what the risk will ultimately be.
Unfortunately, the risk is not just a lawsuit. OCR issued guidance in December 2022 related to these tools. It took the position that many practices and uses of tracking technologies are barred by HIPAA’s Privacy Rule. It reminded readers that civil penalties may apply if the use violates HIPAA. Fortunately, it also gave some examples of where HIPAA does not apply.
If David Glaser were here, he would remind us that guidance is only guidance. It is not the law.
And one federal judge recently ruled that OCR’s interpretation, and I quote, “goes well beyond the meaning of what the statute can bear.”
So, what can you do to reduce your risk?
Start by evaluating:
Ultimately, it is tough to say what the full risk is. Situations vary, and it may be fact-sensitive. And all this action regarding healthcare cookies is still new and changing.
So, while I’m not sure if it’s because my 3-year-old just discovered the glories of Sesame Street, or because I spend a lot of time thinking about cookies on my clients’ websites, either way, the Cookie Monster’s song “C is for Cookie” has been stuck in my head recently.
Cookie Monster sings, “C is for Cookie, that’s good enough for me.”
Cookie Monster is right:
C is for Cookie, and that might be good enough for Cookie Monster.
But C is also for “Class Action Lawsuit.”
Or a “Complaint” filed with the Office for Civil Rights.
Go get yourself a cookie to eat, and then check in on your website’s cookies.
It’s a rather bleak time in healthcare. Morale is low, staffing is short, supply-chain expenses are high, and in clinics, hospitals, and skilled nursing facilities
MDaudit recently released its 2023 Benchmark Report on the trends, challenges, and opportunities being encountered by healthcare organizations in the United States. Crucial needs emphasize that
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Unlock the keys to bridging the clinical-finance disconnect by transforming your approach to revenue cycle collaboration for superior patient care and financial prosperity!
Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he delves into the pivotal connection between case management, utilization review, and hospital revenue cycles, unveiling strategies to enhance communication and align goals effectively. Discover how to overcome hidden challenges hindering seamless collaboration and gain insights imperative for success
During this webcast Dr. Hirsch will breakdown the CMS-4201-F rule and the new federal regulations, how and when they will apply to Medicare Advantages plans.
The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.
A massive task lies ahead! Now’s the time to start preparing your case management and utilization review teams for successful implementation of changes contained in the 2024 IPPS, OPPS and MPFS rules.
Uncover effective techniques to foster provider understanding of CDI, empower CDISs and coders to customize their queries for enhanced effectiveness, and learn to engage adult learners, leveraging their experiences for superior learning outcomes. Elevate your CDI expertise, leading to fewer coding errors, reduced claim denials, and minimized audit issues.
This exclusive ICD10monitor webcast series will help you acquire the critical knowledge you need to completely and accurately assign ICD-10-PCS and CPT® codes for spinal fusion and other common spinal procedures.
This exclusive ICD10monitor webcast is intended to elevate and streamline outpatient coding for spinal procedures. Our expert presenter, Kim Felix, RHIA, CCS., will provide clear, detailed explanations covering spinal anatomy, spinal procedures, and correct CPT coding practices.
During this exclusive ICD10monitor webcast, inpatient coders will gain a profound understanding of prevalent spinal procedures. They’ll delve into the intricate anatomy, grasp the purpose and method behind these procedures, uncover essential elements within physician documentation, and receive expert guidance, step by step, on constructing accurate ICD-10-PCS codes. It’s the key to enhancing their expertise and ensuring coding precision.
Copyright © 2023 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
