If you work for a hospital, please read this article closely. If you’re at any other type of healthcare entity, the price transparency rules don’t apply to you, and you can skip this article.
I’ve been working with hospitals that are trying to comply with a state law requiring them to charge uninsured patients the lowest rate the hospital receives from any contracted insurer. I’m hearing a steady stream of complaints from hospitals that they don’t have access to this data.
I can’t comment on the logistics, but I know this: the federal Price Transparency regulations include provisions that seem to require hospitals to PUBLISH that data. These regulations were published in 2019, appearing in 45 CFR, Part 180. The regulation requires hospitals to put on a publicly available website that doesn’t require registration a machine-readable file that includes their “standard charge” for items and services available to the public. That makes the definition of “standard charge” absolutely essential.
Alas, that definition is incredibly confusing, if not affirmatively misleading. Because it uses standard charge, singular, rather than “charges,” plural, one might assume we are talking about a single price that must be listed. That assumption would be absolutely understandable, and yet it is completely wrong. 45 CFR Section 180.20 defines a standard charge as “the regular rate established by the hospital for an item or service provided to a specific group of pain patients.” Once again, the use of the singular suggests a sole price. But the text continues with a list of five different categories of information, all of which are purportedly part of the “standard charge.” This includes all of the following, as defined under this section:
Now, there’s a lot going on here, and it’s incredibly confusing. It means that each hospital must have, for each item or service it offers, a file that lists the highest and lowest reimbursement received for the corresponding code. In a completely incomprehensible twist, the highest and lowest reimbursements can be de-identified (that is, omit the payer name).
The reason that is so confusing is that you must ALSO list every single payment that’s been negotiated with a third-party payer, including the name of the third-party payer. That’s because the list also includes your “payer-specific negotiated charge.” This machine file is supposed to include what you get from Blue Cross, Aetna, United HealthCare, and every other payer.
The fact that so many hospitals said they don’t know the lowest reimbursements they receive as part of the negotiated contract suggests to me that they are out of compliance with the Price Transparency rule. That rule has some teeth.
Hospitals with 550 beds can now be fined up to $5,500 a day for non-compliance. So, if you are in a hospital, check with your CFO to make sure that you’re making available a machine-readable file on your website that includes the items listed above. The rule is confusing, and the data required is controversial, but ignoring the government’s position risks that you will become one of the next hospitals it chooses to penalize to make a point.
It’s no secret to any of us that there has been quite a bit of recent disagreement between the opposing sides of the political aisle
I’m going to skip over the topic of the hour with the government shutdown and address two actions the federal government has taken in the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
