The OIG Report That Might Go Unnoticed or Simply be Ignored

The OIG Report That Might Go Unnoticed or Simply be Ignored

OIG claims 25% of Medicare beneficiaries experienced adverse effects during their hospitalization in October 2018.

As usual this week I want to write about a U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) audit that many have simply ignored. We’ve all begun to dismiss the OIG’s reports as hyperbolic, based on findings by reviewers with inherent conflicts of interest. So, when the OIG recently published a study of adverse events, it received little attention – but we really should pay attention to this one.

Let’s look at what the OIG did. The agency looked at 834 eligible discharges and any associated 30-day readmissions from October 2018. The sample covered only 629 of the approximately 5,500 hospitals in the U.S. Let’s put that into perspective for a minute. There were 1,076,344 Medicare patients discharged during October 2018. Even if all the 834 discharges were associated with some form of adverse event, that would represent an occurrence rate of 0.08 percent, or 8 per 10,000 discharges, in a combined, unselected population. 

Examples of the “unevenness” of the sampling can be found in a 20-page appendix. Several cases were intracranial or cerebrovascular procedures. One case was a lung transplant. These procedures are not available at many Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) acute-care hospitals. This kind of selection bias makes the results appear maximally unfavorable to all providers.

Nurse screeners reviewed records using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s global trigger tool and assessed present-on-admission (POA) indicators. Nurses discovered 393 qualifying records. A team of six physicians then reviewed the records and found 299 related issues: 115 adverse events and 185 temporary harm events. Real quick, that gives an incidence of 0.03 percent, or 3 per 10,000 discharges.

The largest category was medication-related events, at 43 percent of the sample. Patient care events were 23 percent of the total; the most significant components in this group were skin injuries and falls. The next category was surgical, at 22 percent. Interestingly, over half of the events in the surgical category were determined to be not preventable. Finally, infection was 11 percent of the events.

The study is biased, and probably uninterpretable. So, why am I even talking about it? Three reasons. First, the OIG will tout it as finding that 25 percent of patients experienced harm, much of which was preventable. Second, the report includes IPPS and non-IPPS claims. That means it includes costs to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. Third, buried on page 289 of the report is the claim that “we estimated the costs for all events to be in the hundreds of millions of dollars for October 2018.” That’s an annualized amount of over $1 billion. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) concurred, with a recommendation to broaden the lists of hospital-acquired conditions (HACs). The MA plans will almost certainly respond with aggressive attempts to reduce payments for preventable harm.

So, what should providers do to prepare?

  • First, be scrupulous about diagnoses. Many of the medication events cited in the report were related to “delirium” or other acute mental status changes. Several events related to acute kidney injury. We see encephalopathy, delirium, and acute kidney injury (AKI) reliably denied by payors and contractors. You’re going to be penalized for them, so make sure they’re accurate.
  • Second, plan for medication errors to be aggressively reviewed. Don’t document an association between a medication and an event unless you’re certain they’re related. And explain when they’re unrelated.
  • Third, pursue POA status, especially for skin care and infections. Don’t just pull up a template and click the normal boxes.

The OIG just handed CMS and MA a new playbook.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC

John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC is a licensed physician in several jurisdictions and is admitted to the California bar. He is also the founder of The Aegis Firm, a healthcare consulting firm providing consultative and litigation support on a wide variety of criminal and civil matters related to healthcare. He lectures frequently on black-letter health law, mediation, medical staff relations, and medical ethics, as well as patient and physician rights. Dr. Hall hopes to help explain complex problems at the intersection of medicine and law and prepare providers to manage those problems.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 13, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

This first session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature an in-depth explanation of FY26 changes to ICD-10-CM codes and guidelines, CCs/MCCs, and revisions to the MCE, presented by presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 12, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025
Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.

June 11, 2025
Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Substance abuse is everywhere. It’s a complicated diagnosis with wide-ranging implications well beyond acute care. The face of addiction continues to change so it’s important to remember not just the addict but the spectrum of extended victims and the other social determinants and legal ramifications. Join John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC, for a critical Q&A on navigating substance abuse in 2025.  Register today and be a part of the conversation!

July 16, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24