While it is common to have payer contracts include a substantial percentage discount off of your billed charge, the practice creates avoidable risk.
Healthcare pricing is atypical, or maybe even unique. While some industries have unusual pricing, such as the dynamic pricing used by airlines that can result in two people in the same row having paid radically different fares, in that case the consumers have explicitly agreed to the deal. It’s rare to see situations in which transactions occur in the absence of any prior agreement about the price.
One of the few times I can think of when people periodically buy a product not knowing the price is the “special” in a restaurant. But typically, the waiter discloses the charge. When a buyer and seller enter into a deal without an explicit agreement on reimbursement, you have what’s called an “implied contract.” The buyer agrees to pay, and the seller agrees to accept, a “reasonable amount.” In the event of a dispute, the judge will make a decision about what “reasonable” is.
You can see this play out in the independent dispute resolution (IDR) process of the No Surprises Act. Common sense will tell you the sorts of things a judge might consider when determining reasonability.
Obviously, market data from other organizations will be a factor. But the rate that your organization accepts as payment from other similarly situated patients seems like an extraordinarily compelling piece of evidence.
Imagine the following scenario: the bill charged for a service is $1,000. You have contracts with many insurers wherein they pay you about 60 percent of your billed charges; in other words, the contract’s insurer pays you $600 for the service. You have a policy that says uninsured patients pay 70 percent of your billed charges, or $700, for the service.
Now imagine you’re the judge.
A patient with indemnity insurance receives the service. The indemnity insurer balked at the $1,000 bill, claiming it’s too high. “Other insurance pays $600, and patients without insurance pay $700. We should not have to pay $1,000.” How would you rule?
While I’m typically not terribly sympathetic to insurance companies, in this case I think the indemnity insurer has a pretty good point. If an uninsured patient walking in off the street is going to pay $700, why should their insured patients walking in off the street be expected to pay more, in the absence of an exclusive agreement?
My main point is that when most patients are paying 20, 30, or even 40 percent less than your billed charge, there’s a compelling argument that your fee is 20, 30, or even 40 percent lower than you claim it to be. I can make arguments to defend the arrangements, but there is a real risk those arguments won’t carry the day.
As a result, my advice is to avoid situations in which you have significant percentage discounts, whether they are agreed to contractually or established via policy, unless it’s something provided to a patient with demonstrated financial hardship. While not perfect, an agreed-upon price is far superior to a percentage discount. Some of the same issues exist, but at least you aren’t making it easy for someone to argue that the billed charge isn’t real.
When you have a percentage discount, you may be giving insurance companies a “cheap trick” to demand lower prices. So I will close with reference to a pair of Cheap Trick songs. I hate it when I have to say to my clients, “didn’t I, didn’t I, didn’t I see you crying?”
And I hate when they “surrender, surrender.” So don’t give yourself away! Stomp out those percentage discounts.
Imagine receiving notice that your healthcare organization faces a potential multimillion-dollar repayment demand based on the review of just 100 claims. This scenario, playing out
Some of you may have read my article from last week kindly published as a special bulletin. For those who did not, let me recap.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Physician queries are essential for accurate documentation and claims data, but they are increasingly scrutinized by payors, leading to denials and revenue leakage. This webcast, led by industry expert Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, provides actionable strategies to craft compliant queries, reduce denials, and enhance revenue integrity. Attendees will gain insights into clinical validation queries, how to avoid common pitfalls, and learn best practices to defend against query denials. Don’t miss this opportunity to refine your query process and protect your organization’s financial health.
Master the complexities of heart failure coding with this expert-led webcast by Emily Montemayor, CCS, CMBCS, COC, CPC, CPMA. Discover strategies to ensure compliance with ICD-10-CM guidelines, documentation integrity, and capture comorbidities like CKD and hypertension. Learn how to resolve coding challenges, improve documentation practices, and submit clean claims to minimize denials and safeguard your organization’s financial health. With practical insights and real-world examples, this session equips you to prevent revenue leakage, enhance compliance, and secure optimal reimbursement—all while supporting better patient outcomes.
Prepare your organization for the 2025 OPPS updates with expert insights from Tiffani Bouchard, CCS, CRCR, a Revenue Integrity Professional with over 30 years of experience. This webcast will address critical challenges in charge capture and coding, providing clarity on APC policies, C-APC packaging, exclusions, and payer-specific requirements. Attendees will learn actionable strategies to ensure compliance, optimize reimbursement, and mitigate risks of claim denials. Gain the knowledge needed to implement updates effectively, educate your team, and maintain seamless revenue cycle operations in the face of evolving OPPS complexities.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.
Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.
The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule brings significant changes to payment rates, coverage, and coding for physician services, impacting practices nationwide. Join Stanley Nachimson, MS., as he provides a comprehensive guide to understanding these updates, offering actionable insights on new Medicare-covered services, revised coding rules, and payment policies effective January 1. Learn how to adapt your practices to maintain compliance, maximize reimbursement, and plan for revenue in 2025. Whether you’re a physician, coder, or financial staff member, this session equips you with the tools to navigate Medicare’s evolving requirements confidently and efficiently.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Copyright © 2025 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
