The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Proposed Rule has arrived delivering with it new policy and provision changes for next year that will have impacts across the healthcare world. As usual, the proposed rule outlines potential updates to a variety of policies and provisions that dictate payment for many services across healthcare included in the Quality Payment Program (QPP), the Merit-Based Incentives Payment System (MIPS), and Advanced Alternative Payment Models (APMs). Keep in mind that these policies are proposed and will not be made final until the release of the final rule. Even though the final rule is yet to be set in stone, professionals should be aware of impending changes that will shape payment, compliance, and the future of various programs.
For 2025, the conversion factor yields a mixed bag for radiology-related modalities. CMS is projecting a 2025 conversion factor of $32.356 as opposed to the 2024 conversion factor of $33.287. The American College of Radiology (ACR) notes that the calculations were made “By removing the 1.25 percent provided by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 that applied to services furnished from January 1, 2024, through March 8, 2024, and the 2.93 percent payment increase provided by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2024 that replaced the previous 1.25 percent increase and applied to services furnished from March 9, 2024, through December 31, 2024. CMS then applied a positive 0.05 percent budget neutrality adjustment”.
This seemingly small decrease has a mix of implications for radiology reimbursement. In something of a reprieve in years, CMS projects a zero percent change for radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation oncology. For interventional radiology, a sharper aggregate decrease of two percent is expected.
Even though the impact remains neutral for some modalities, the adjustment still delivers grief for many stakeholders with organizations like the Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging stating, “Unfortunately, these cuts come during a period of continued growth in the cost of medical practice, with CMS projecting a 3.6% rise in the Medicare Economic Index for 2025.”
Payment for radiopharmaceuticals in a physician’s office setting is an area often subjected to scrutiny and confusion, raising questions over methodologies. In the proposed rule, CMS has acted to provide clarity as to the precise methods available to Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) when it comes to radiopharmaceutical pricing. For those radiopharmaceuticals delivered in a setting other than a hospital outpatient department, CMS states that MACs are responsible for imposing payment limits for these radiopharms and will use any methodology employed for payment limit decisions regarding radiopharms active on or before November 2003.
COVID-19 unleashed a wave of changes and flexibility to help healthcare professionals adapt to the pandemic. With the March 31, 2020, interim rule, CMS transformed the working definition of “direct supervision” over the course of the public health emergency. The definition was updated in regard to supervision for the following:
The definition change granted a designated supervising professional to be immediately available using the virtual tools of two-way, real-time audio and video technology in lieu of their physical, in-person presence. Further rulemaking continued this flexibility extension, which was a popular decision among stakeholders. These flexibilities were heavily utilized, and CMS received comments from practitioners on the critical need to keep this flexibility active. CMS, however, continues to hold concerns over patient safety and quality of care and is acting to collect more information for further evaluation.
According to the ACR, “CMS believes an incremental approach is warranted, particularly in instances where unexpected or adverse events may arise for procedures which may be riskier or more intense. Considering these potential safety and quality of care implications, and exercising an abundance of caution, CMS is extending this flexibility for all services on a temporary basis only.”
Expect this flexibility through real-time audio and visual telecommunications technology to remain available through December 31, 2025.
Stay tuned to future editions for more insight into the impacts of the final 2025 PFS rule.
Information Sources:
https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2024-14828.pdf
https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Advocacy/AIA/ACR-Preliminary-Summary-2025-MPFS-PR-Final.pdf
Picture this: You are driving through an area you don’t know well. It is a cold day. You stop to get gas. You fill the
Federal health officials have announced the launch of the Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare (CRUSH) initiative. The announcement was framed as a decisive step
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
