Even self-proclaimed “experts” don’t always deliver reliable information about a thorny piece of federal legislation.
Over the last month I have taken in two presentations about the No Surprises Act (NSA), offered by a trade group that I generally consider to be highly reputable.
Each contained significant errors. During the first presentation, a panel of antitrust experts was discussing price transparency. I asked about a recently delayed provision of the No Surprises Act that will ultimately require co-convenors such as a hospital and a surgeon who is performing a surgery at the hospital to coordinate to issue a combined good-faith estimate.
If such a hospital employs surgeons, the sharing of price information means that competitors are sharing price data – which isn’t inherently illegal, but makes it much easier to argue that there are improper agreements regarding price. While I know something about antitrust law, I would not call myself the world’s top antitrust expert, and I was curious if lawyers who analyze such matters full-time might see the issue differently.
To my surprise, they dismissed the premise of the question, arguing that there was no requirement that the physician and the hospital share pricing data. Apparently, these lawyers knew antitrust law, but not the No Surprises Act. They were mistakenly believing that the posting requirements found in the Price Transparency provision apply to the No Surprises Act. In fact, they argued with me rather vociferously, asserting that merely posting prices was sufficient, until another member of the audience echoed the existence of that No Surprises Act requirement.
In the second presentation, last week, someone asked the speaker whether physician practices were required to issue good-faith estimates. The presenter, who claimed to be an expert on the No Surprises Act, indicated that he believed that the law only applied to hospitals.
On the one hand, I am sympathetic to the confusion. The No Surprises Act has various tentacles that can make it difficult to understand. It is true that one portion of the law only applies to services delivered at hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), freestanding emergency departments, and in air ambulances. But there is a second portion of the law that applies to any licensed healthcare entity or professional.
It is true that the government made things confusing by using the term “facilities” to describe both portions of the law, with “facilities” defined once as limited to hospitals/EDs/ASCs/air ambulances, and the second time as all licensed healthcare professionals and entities. It was a terrible error for the government to use different definitions for the same word. But the fact remains that an expert should know that the good-faith estimate requirement is in the portion of the rule applying broadly to all licensed professionals and organizations. Clinics, nursing homes, home health agencies, physical therapists, and the like are all required to offer good-faith estimates. Currently, that requirement is limited to individuals who are not using insurance to pay for their care, but that is slated to change in the future. But back to my main point, which is that you cannot blindly rely on anyone or anything to be a categorically accurate reporter of information. I can’t be too indignant. I make mistakes, at times learning about provisions I did not initially know were there.
George Washington apocryphally said, “I cannot tell a lie.” But even the most honest among us can be wrong. I am not really able to identify a great solution to the problem I am describing. I guess what I am saying is that when there is a disagreement about the interpretation of a legal provision, do not let the pedigree of the speaker or the reputation of the organization, law firm, or consultant prevent you from considering the possibility that they are wrong.
Programming note: Listen to healthcare attorney David Glaser’s “Risky Business” report on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck.
Following President Trump’s move into the Oval Office and his administration getting set up in the federal agencies, we’ve seen unprecedented movement on certain legislative
With the 2025 legislative sessions in full swing by this point, I wanted to give everyone a glance at one of the hottest topics in
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Physician queries are essential for accurate documentation and claims data, but they are increasingly scrutinized by payors, leading to denials and revenue leakage. This webcast, led by industry expert Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, provides actionable strategies to craft compliant queries, reduce denials, and enhance revenue integrity. Attendees will gain insights into clinical validation queries, how to avoid common pitfalls, and learn best practices to defend against query denials. Don’t miss this opportunity to refine your query process and protect your organization’s financial health.
Master the complexities of heart failure coding with this expert-led webcast by Emily Montemayor, CCS, CMBCS, COC, CPC, CPMA. Discover strategies to ensure compliance with ICD-10-CM guidelines, documentation integrity, and capture comorbidities like CKD and hypertension. Learn how to resolve coding challenges, improve documentation practices, and submit clean claims to minimize denials and safeguard your organization’s financial health. With practical insights and real-world examples, this session equips you to prevent revenue leakage, enhance compliance, and secure optimal reimbursement—all while supporting better patient outcomes.
Prepare your organization for the 2025 OPPS updates with expert insights from Tiffani Bouchard, CCS, CRCR, a Revenue Integrity Professional with over 30 years of experience. This webcast will address critical challenges in charge capture and coding, providing clarity on APC policies, C-APC packaging, exclusions, and payer-specific requirements. Attendees will learn actionable strategies to ensure compliance, optimize reimbursement, and mitigate risks of claim denials. Gain the knowledge needed to implement updates effectively, educate your team, and maintain seamless revenue cycle operations in the face of evolving OPPS complexities.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.
Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.
The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule brings significant changes to payment rates, coverage, and coding for physician services, impacting practices nationwide. Join Stanley Nachimson, MS., as he provides a comprehensive guide to understanding these updates, offering actionable insights on new Medicare-covered services, revised coding rules, and payment policies effective January 1. Learn how to adapt your practices to maintain compliance, maximize reimbursement, and plan for revenue in 2025. Whether you’re a physician, coder, or financial staff member, this session equips you with the tools to navigate Medicare’s evolving requirements confidently and efficiently.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Copyright © 2025 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
