Sounding the Alarm About False Positives

There are false negatives; there are false positives; there are untested individuals with disease.

 I am in the process of developing a 90-minute COVID-19 webinar for ICDUniversity in December to outline new codes and updates, and my inbox is replete every day with articles about the coronavirus.

On Sunday, I took a walk with my husband and had to grab a surgical mask from his stash in his car, because all my handsewn masks were in the wash. I had to take it off after a short while, because it smelled so vile that it literally made me want to vomit. He donned it and assured me that that was what those masks always smell like.

The Cleveland Clinic no longer allows providers to wear homemade or store-bought masks; they are mandated to wear surgical masks, although an email from them just this morning encouraged the general population to wear a cloth mask or face covering when out. Thank goodness I no longer practice clinically!

How this relates to the topic at hand is that a study came out recently, produced by 13 academic medical centers in 12 states, noting that 6 percent of 3,248 participants had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies even though they had not been aware of contracting COVID-19. The findings also showed that:

  • Healthcare providers (HCPs) who reported always wearing face coverings when interacting with patients had lower seroprevalence than those who did not; and
  • HCPs who reported a shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) at their medical centers were more likely to have detectable antibodies than those who had ample supplies.

Forty-four percent of the approximately 195 members of the serology-positive group “did not believe that they had previously had COVID-19.” I wondered, were some of these false positive antibody tests? This reminded me of other instances of false positives in the news, such as with professional sports teams and at colleges. I’m quite attuned to this ever since my father’s false=positive PCR testing debacle.

This led me to research false positives in PCR testing, and I found an article in The Lancet noting that false-positive COVID-19 tests in the United Kingdom are becoming increasingly likely, with substantial consequences at the personal, health system, and societal levels. It makes sense – more testing, even with a low false-positive rate, will lead to more false positives by the law of numbers.

One of the references from The Lancet article was another article centering on the false discovery rate, which is the proportion of positive test results that are false positive, and its relationship to prevalence, which is the percentage of population currently infected. If the positivity rate is low, even a small false-positive rate can produce a large false discovery rate.

I am really hesitant to sound too loud an alarm about false positives. I would rather have people take a false positive test seriously than have a person with asymptomatic COVID-19 spreading it around because they blew off a positive test as being incorrect. I am afraid, however, that the statistics about COVID-19 are somewhat inaccurate. There are false negatives; there are false positives; there are untested individuals with disease.

The death rate may be inaccurate, but over 230,000 people have died in the U.S. For every person who dies, 19 more have required hospitalization. Many of those will have permanent or long-lasting heart, lung, or neurological damage, including strokes. It is important to remember that COVID-19 isn’t a binary “dead” or “fully recovered” situation.

The studies are incontrovertible in that wearing face coverings save lives. If 95 percent of us wore masks, the total number of deaths would drop by almost half. Vaccines aren’t immediately forthcoming, and adoption of vaccination is likely to be feeble. A large World Health Organization (WHO) study just came out suggesting that remdesivir, one of the drugs which President Trump received when he had COVID-19, does not reduce mortality.

Thanksgiving and Christmas are coming. It is going to be a long, hard winter. Listen to the science, Tony Fauci, and me: practice handwashing, crowd avoidance, physical distancing, and wearing a mask over your nose and mouth. Stay safe.

Programming Note: Listen to Dr. Erica Remer report this story live today during Talk Ten Tuesdays, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C has a unique perspective as a practicing emergency physician for 25 years, with extensive coding, CDI, and ICD-10 expertise. As physician advisor for University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, Ohio for four years, she trained 2,700 providers in ICD-10, closed hundreds of queries, fought numerous DRG clinical determination and medical necessity denials, and educated CDI specialists and healthcare providers with engaging, case-based presentations. She transitioned to independent consulting in July 2016. Dr. Remer is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and is the co-host on the popular Talk Ten Tuesdays weekly, live Internet radio broadcasts.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.

April 13, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Fourth Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

December 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Third Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

October 12, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Second Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

July 13, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24