Last week, a federal judge struck down the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ban on noncompete agreements in employment contracts, with the judge noting that the FTC had “exceeded its authority” with an “unreasonably overbroad” prohibition.
The ban was scheduled to take effect nationally on Sept. 4th.
If that bit of word salad is confusing, simply put, the FTC wants to ban the use of noncompete agreements, but this court decision has allowed them to continue…for now.
Noncompete agreements restrict employees from working with or starting competing businesses within a certain geographical area and time frame after leaving their employer. They have also long been a contentious issue.
And while the FTC can appeal the Court’s decision, for the healthcare industry in particular, the ban (which exempts nonprofit entities) would mark a significant shift in labor regulation, with implications for healthcare professionals, patients, and systems at large.
For those in the healthcare workforce, the Court’s decision could substantially affect career mobility, as noncompetes can restrict a provider’s capacity to relocate or switch employers without facing legal repercussions. This can be especially burdensome in regions with a limited number of job opportunities, or in highly specialized fields where job options are already scarce.
According to some experts, the restrictions imposed by noncompete agreements can also lead to a concentration of employment within a few large healthcare systems, potentially stifling innovation and reducing job diversity.
From a patient care perspective, some argue that the Court’s decision may generate concerns about accessibility and continuity of care, because noncompete agreements can limit a patient’s choice of healthcare providers by restricting their options if their current provider leaves their practice.
It has been further suggested that the Court’s decision to maintain noncompete clauses affects the healthcare industry as a whole – the implication being that prohibiting these agreements would offer providers the ability to move more freely between employers, promoting a more competitive job market, which could encourage healthcare organizations to offer things like better working conditions and higher salaries to attract and retain top talent. That, in turn, would likely contribute to overall improvements in healthcare delivery and provider satisfaction.
Business and hospital groups, however, have opposed limiting use of noncompetes, suggesting that their use protects key investments that companies have made in worker recruitment/retention and prevents intellectual property and trade secrets from being shared with competitors.
Now, it’s worth mentioning that while the state of the FTC’s noncompete ban is still somewhat in limbo at the federal level, in the meantime, states themselves continue to pass their own laws banning noncompetes in healthcare.
For example, California, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Oklahoma already prohibit noncompete clauses in employment contracts. Ten other states currently prohibit noncompetes for specific healthcare jobs, and four others passed noncompete bans during their 2024 legislative sessions, all of which take effect in 2025.
The recent court decision to block the government’s ban on noncompete agreements has the potential to foster greater competition within the healthcare industry, but it also raises concerns about provider job mobility and patient care stability.
As the healthcare landscape considers how it will adapt to a potential new reality of no longer using noncompete agreements, stakeholders – including policymakers, healthcare providers, and patients – will need to navigate these challenges carefully to ensure that the outcomes align with the overarching goals of improving care quality and supporting a thriving, equitable healthcare workforce.
However, with much ambiguity still clouding the issue, we may have to wait for the Supreme Court to make a decisive ruling before we have clarity.
Reference Material
The Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPICs) were developed to ensure the integrity of Medicare and Medicaid by identifying and recovering improper payments. Established to streamline
In a legal rebuke that should make federal agencies everywhere sit up straighter, a U.S. District Court in Texas has just sent the Centers for
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
