We often talk about length of stay, and you all should know by now that I absolutely hate when the Medicare geometric mean length of stay (GMLOS) is used as a goal for every patient in each Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG).
I’ll repeat my mantra: the goal length of stay for every patient is when every single day of their hospital stay is spent providing medically necessary hospital care. If they don’t require hospital care, they shouldn’t be in the hospital.
Well, last week saw the publication of another article that demonstrates the importance of reducing avoidable days. This study looked at patients 75 years of age and older who were admitted to the hospital but were required to be kept in the ED overnight due to the lack of an inpatient bed. Compared to patients who did not have to board in the ED, the boarded patients had a 41-percent higher risk of dying in the hospital, more adverse events (including falls and nosocomial infections), and longer overall lengths of stay.
Now, this data is probably not a surprise to anyone, but sometimes you do need data to motivate change. Maybe it’s worth risking a bad patient satisfaction score from the patient upstairs who wants to stay another day but has no medical necessity, in order to save another patient from harm or even death.
Moving on, Kepro, the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO), released their November newsletter, which included what they called an immediate advocacy success story. In this case, it was an inpatient who was not happy with the attending physician and their impending discharge, so their representative filed a discharge appeal. Kepro ruled in favor of the patient. As Kepro describes it, “However, in the appeal determination provided to the facility, the Kepro peer reviewer had requested a neurological consult, but the attending physician at the hospital refused to do the consult and wrote another discharge order.”
Kepro states that they then contacted the hospital director of quality and patient safety, who then contacted the patient’s case manager to discuss the request for the consult by the Kepro reviewer with the attending.
Wait a minute. First, this started as a discharge appeal. In a discharge appeal, the QIO is supposed to determine if ongoing hospital care is warranted, not whether additional consultations by specialists are required. Their reviewer determined that ongoing hospital care was necessary, and the hospital and attending complied. They likely did not issue the Hospital-Issued Notices of Noncoverage (HINN) 12 and would not have charged the patient for the inpatient days, awaiting the appeal determination. But when the determination was issued and the attending informed, the attending apparently did not feel that a neurology consultation was necessary, so they did not order one – and in addition, they felt that at the point the appeal determination was received, the patient was stable for discharge (so the attending again ordered discharge).
As Kepro describes it, this evolved into an immediate advocacy issue concerning the quality of care provided by the physician, since that consultation was not ordered. In that case, section 5035.3 of the QIO Manual requires the QIO to contact the practitioner and give the practitioner an opportunity to participate.
Kepro did no such thing. I would bet that, as at many hospitals, the attending has no idea who the director of quality is, and yet Kepro considered that person to be representing the physician’s views. We have all played the telephone game as children; the likelihood that the information received and conveyed by the attending physician matched what the QIO medical director said and heard is small.
Now, don’t get me wrong: patients have a right to appeal their discharge and request help through the immediate advocacy process provided by the QIOs, but the QIOs really need to follow the rules, just as we do. In this case, it seems that the QIO medical director should have called the attending physician to discuss not only the rationale for the neurology consultation but also the patient’s concern about their care.
I do not usually report on what other media are reporting (with the exception of Nina Youngstrom’s reports on Medicare compliance!), but John Oliver’s story
In the Medicare fee-for-service world, “prepayment review” (also sometimes called “prepayment medical review” or “pre-claim review,” depending on the context) means that a claim is
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
