Recent Landmark Court Decisions Regarding Federal Oversight of Healthcare Demand Attention

Within the healthcare regulatory landscape, there are a couple phrases that have become a bit played out of late: “let the courts decide” or “we’ll see what the courts say.” 

Those expressions, dogearing important policy discussions for another day, currently refer to issues that may take months or years to find resolution. A couple have, however, seen meaningful movement over the past week, and I would be remiss for not circling back to scrutinize how they are moving and shaking medical practice. 

The first one worth mentioning is State of Oregon et al vs. Kennedy et al, from the District Court in Eugene, Oregon. 

During a Monitor Mondays broadcast back in January, I reported that the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had declared he would henceforth withhold Medicaid funds for gender-affirming care, and hold hospitals in violation of Medicare’s Conditions of Participation if they continued to provide such care.[1]

In accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act, “the Court indicated that it will grant Plaintiff States’ motion for summary judgment, deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss, hold unlawful and set aside the Kennedy Declaration, and declare that ‘defendants lack authority to establish superseding standards of care to exclude providers from federal healthcare programs’”. 

To prevent HHS from moving forward with any actions stemming from the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG), and perhaps even the proposed rules (CMS-2541-P and CMS-3481-P), the Plaintiffs filed a request for permanent injunction last Thursday. One of the stated intentions of the injunction is to ensure that members of the administration “do not simply re-adopt the reasoning of the Kennedy Declaration . . . under a different name or via a different instrument.”[2] 

The second recent judgement we cannot ignore is the U.S. Supreme Court’s 8-1 ruling on Chiles vs. Salazar, concerning a Colorado law banning conversion therapy” on minors.[3] 

Now, despite consensus against using conversion therapy by the largest and most reputable medical societies of practitioners in this arena in the U.S. – namely, the American Medical Association, American Psychological Association, and American Academy of Pediatrics – the court’s majority focused on the perceived First Amendment issue at play. 

The result: the current Colorado law was deemed unconstitutional, and licensed therapists can – under the authority given to them via their state license – try to talk gay, lesbian, and non-binary individuals out of living as themselves, regardless of the known harms of doing so. 

The gravity of that was not lost on the singular dissenting Justice, the Honorable Ketanji Brown Jackson. As she stated in her 35-page dissent, mixing up providers’ standard of care with individuals’ freedom of speech could be “catastrophic,” “ushering in an era of unprofessional and unsafe medical care.” 

As a physician, I echo Justice Jackson’s concerns. For instance, if I advised a person with atrial fibrillation and a very high stroke risk not to take a blood thinner because I simply did not believe in it, and then they had a stroke and died, I am pretty sure there would be professional consequences regarding my state licensure. I may have a personal freedom to say whatever I want about blood thinners, and even call them an “abomination” because they are not revered in religious textbooks – but do I have a responsibility to practice sound medicine, as a credentialed, licensed physician?

Likewise, if a depressed patient told me they were suicidal, with an active plan, and my subsequent treatment recommendation was they go home and pray because “god is good:” if they go home and end their life, should there not be a professional consequence for my failing to uphold the standard of care to actually secure safety for that person?

As court cases continue to be decided by our friends in the legal profession, I hope that judges and juries get it right sometimes – and that we, as physicians, have the fortitude to protect our patients and our profession when they do not.

References
  1. Kennedy R. “Declaration of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services: Safety, Effectiveness, and Professional Standards of Care for Sex Rejecting Procedures on Children and Adolescents”. Health and Human Services, Dec 18, 2025. www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/declaration-pediatric-sex-rejecting-procedures.pdf
  2. US District Court for the District of Oregon Eugene Division. “State of Oregon et al v. Kennedy et al”. Dept of Justice, 6:25-cv-02409. Apr 2, 2026. https://litigationtracker.law.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/State-of-Oregon-et-al-v.-Kennedy-et-al_2026_4_2_PLAINTIFFS-SUPPLEMENTAL-BRIEFING-ON-INJUNCTIVE-RELIEF.pdf
  3. Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. “Chiles v. Salazar, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies et al”. Supreme Court of the United States, Mar 31, 2026. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539_fd9g.pdf
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering OB GYN Coding Accuracy: Precision Coding for Compliance and Reimbursement

Gain clarity and confidence in OB‑GYN coding with this expert‑led webcast featuring Sherri L. Clayton, RHIT, CSS. You’ll learn how to apply global maternity package rules accurately, select the right CPT codes for procedures and visits, and identify documentation gaps that lead to denials. With practical guidance and real examples, this session helps you strengthen compliance, reduce audit risk, and ensure accurate reimbursement for women’s health services.

May 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.

April 13, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Fourth Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

December 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Third Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

October 12, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

BLOOM INTO SAVINGS! Get 25% OFF during our spring sale through March 27. Use code SPRING26 at checkout to claim this offer.

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24