If your lawyer ever writes you a letter/email telling you to refund money, I recommend you get a new lawyer.
Now, it is very easy to misconstrue what I just said. I am not suggesting in any shape, way, or form that a lawyer should not recommend that you refund money when the lawyer believes a refund is appropriate. If you have billed for a service you did not provide, billed for a service that was not medically necessary, or billed for a service where you were not satisfying Medicare’s conditions of payment, I will recommend that a client refund.
The key phrase in my topic sentence was “write a letter/email.” A lawyer orally giving advice to refund is entirely appropriate. Memorializing it in writing is very unhelpful.
While I understand that many people would say a lawyer’s primary responsibility is helping individuals understand the law, I think you could make a credible argument that, in fact, the most important thing a lawyer can do is make their client look good. Helping understand the law is merely one of the means to the all-important end.
Think back to your childhood for a moment. You are playing with someone, a friend or a sibling, who does something to hurt you. An adult intervenes in the situation and quickly chastises your playmate saying, “apologize right now.” How much weight do you give to that apology? If you are like I am, the answer is very little. You are going to question the sincerity of the purported remorse.
A forced apology does not carry much weight.
A forced refund does not look much better. While it is true that the attorney-client privilege should permit you to avoid revealing that your lawyer recommended a refund, there are a wide range of scenarios that may result in the privilege being waived. It is entirely possible that the lawyer’s recommendation will become public.
As a result, while I will orally recommend a client refund money, I have yet to encounter a situation where I memorialize that advice in writing. The decision to refund always lies with the client. And if a refund is made, it should always look like it was the client’s idea.
And let me be clear. I am not saying lawyers shouldn’t be candid in telling clients when they believe a refund is wise. I am just talking about how the advice is framed, and whether it makes the client, or the lawyer, look good.
If the lawyer is giving advice to refund, it is because the client sought counsel. If the client asked, it is because they genuinely want to know whether they should be making a refund.
Whenever a lawyer can give credit for a good idea to the client, they should. When the lawyer makes it look like they are pushing a refund, they are making the client look bad.
You want a lawyer who is committed to making you look good. Clients should get the credit while lawyers take the blame. If your lawyer doesn’t see that, get a new one!
Programming note:
Listen to healthcare attorney David Glaser every Monday morning on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck at 10 Eastern.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
It is a bummer when you get hoisted on the petard of intellectual inconsistency. Whether it is different medical professionals with different approaches to a
In a recent article, I described a documentation environment governed by two distinct and often competing controlling systems. The first is the regulatory framework established
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
