Reasons Why Your Attorney Shouldn’t Write a Refund Letter

Reasons Why Your Attorney Shouldn’t Write a Refund Letter

If your lawyer ever writes you a letter/email telling you to refund money, I recommend you get a new lawyer. 

Now, it is very easy to misconstrue what I just said.  I am not suggesting in any shape, way, or form that a lawyer should not recommend that you refund money when the lawyer believes a refund is appropriate.  If you have billed for a service you did not provide, billed for a service that was not medically necessary, or billed for a service where you were not satisfying Medicare’s conditions of payment, I will recommend that a client refund. 

The key phrase in my topic sentence was “write a letter/email.”  A lawyer orally giving advice to refund is entirely appropriate.  Memorializing it in writing is very unhelpful. 

While I understand that many people would say a lawyer’s primary responsibility is helping individuals understand the law, I think you could make a credible argument that, in fact, the most important thing a lawyer can do is make their client look good.  Helping understand the law is merely one of the means to the all-important end.   

Think back to your childhood for a moment.  You are playing with someone, a friend or a sibling, who does something to hurt you.  An adult intervenes in the situation and quickly chastises your playmate saying, “apologize right now.”  How much weight do you give to that apology?  If you are like I am, the answer is very little.  You are going to question the sincerity of the purported remorse. 

A forced apology does not carry much weight.

A forced refund does not look much better.  While it is true that the attorney-client privilege should permit you to avoid revealing that your lawyer recommended a refund, there are a wide range of scenarios that may result in the privilege being waived.  It is entirely possible that the lawyer’s recommendation will become public. 

As a result, while I will orally recommend a client refund money, I have yet to encounter a situation where I memorialize that advice in writing.  The decision to refund always lies with the client.  And if a refund is made, it should always look like it was the client’s idea.

And let me be clear. I am not saying lawyers shouldn’t be candid in telling clients when they believe a refund is wise.  I am just talking about how the advice is framed, and whether it makes the client, or the lawyer, look good. 

If the lawyer is giving advice to refund, it is because the client sought counsel.  If the client asked, it is because they genuinely want to know whether they should be making a refund. 

Whenever a lawyer can give credit for a good idea to the client, they should.  When the lawyer makes it look like they are pushing a refund, they are making the client look bad. 

You want a lawyer who is committed to making you look good.  Clients should get the credit while lawyers take the blame.  If your lawyer doesn’t see that, get a new one!

Programming note:

Listen to healthcare attorney David Glaser every Monday morning on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck at 10 Eastern.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 2: Master ICD-10-PCS Changes

This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 13, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 1: Master ICD-10-CM Changes

This first session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature an in-depth explanation of FY26 changes to ICD-10-CM codes and guidelines, CCs/MCCs, and revisions to the MCE, presented by presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 12, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025
Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Open Door Forum Webcast Series

Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.

June 11, 2025
Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Open Door Forum: The Changing Face of Addiction: Coding, Compliance & Care

Substance abuse is everywhere. It’s a complicated diagnosis with wide-ranging implications well beyond acute care. The face of addiction continues to change so it’s important to remember not just the addict but the spectrum of extended victims and the other social determinants and legal ramifications. Join John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC, for a critical Q&A on navigating substance abuse in 2025.  Register today and be a part of the conversation!

July 16, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24