With little fanfare, CMS posted data for 2019 RAC activity – and the results weren’t pretty.
Let me start today with a thanks to all who submitted comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on the rule to rein in Medicare Advantage (MA) behavior. If any of you listened to the CMS Hospital Open Door Forum last week, I once again asked to clarify that since CMS was simply codifying current rules, does that not mean that the rules are in place right now, and MA plans should be abiding by the Two-Midnight Rule today?
The response was that there was no one from CMS on the call who could provide an answer, but they would get back to me. I am going to continue to pester them all year until they give an answer. There is no reason we should have to wait until next January.
One thing we have not talked about in a while is the Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs). Remember them? I know they have been busy auditing for commercial and MA payors, digging up paid claims from years gone by, running their proprietary algorithms, and somehow finding claims that should not have been paid (in their opinion) and earning their fee, likely a contingency fee, forcing providers to now fight for their payments. But the RACs have been continuing to audit Medicare claims.
With no fanfare, and found by me only by accident, CMS posted some data from 2019 RAC activity. Remember 2019? Before COVID? Oh, such fond memories. In that year, the RACs performed 168,000 reviews and denied 35,000, for a 20.8-percent denial rate. Of those denials, almost 20,000 were appealed at level 1, to the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC), with 56 percent ruled partially or fully in favor of the provider. I am going to call out Performant, because over 91 percent of their home health and hospice denials were overturned at the MAC level, and Cotiviti, because over 70 percent of their Part B denials for Jurisdiction L were overturned. Not much that can be said about overturn rates like that, especially that which can be printed.
At the second level, the Qualified Independent Contractor (QIC), the RACs did not do very well either. A total of 33 percent of denials taken to the QIC were overturned in favor of the provider, with Performant doing the worst, losing 43 percent of their cases. In 2019, 18,000 cases were appealed to the ALJs (administrative law judges), with 27 percent of cases dismissed with no explanation provided, 0.3 percent of cases remanded back, and 37 percent of cases decided in favor of the provider. And finally, 525 cases went to the Departmental Appeals Board (DAB), with only two decisions in favor of the provider and most of the rest dismissed or withdrawn.
Interestingly, 32 percent of providers still send their records via paper, and 20 percent via fax. I guess we are still not yet in the digital age.
Now, the statistic I do not understand is that the RACs also report their accuracy rates, and they range from 94.6 to 99.6 percent. You may not know that their accuracy rate also determines their contingency fee rate, with every percentage point over 95 percent leading to a 0.2 percent increase in their fee. But how do they have an accuracy rate that high, but yet 56 percent of their denials are reversed at level 1? That sure sounds like a 44-percent accuracy rate.
The worst-performing RAC was HMS, and I recently heard some rumors about HMS and the outrageous way they perform Medicaid RAC audits in one large southern state. Sure enough, there is a seven-page instruction manual on how to submit an appeal properly. If you appeal a denial and you say “your denial,” it will be rejected, because the initial denial was from a different department. If the records are in the wrong order, it will be rejected. And I have heard that HMS has an onerous form that must accompany appeals, and if even one space is left blank, even if it is not applicable, the appeal is rejected without any review.
I know I am preaching to the choir, but it sure seems that the RAC program remains fatally flawed, with contractors lacking not only accuracy, but apparently, also ethics.
Programming note: Listen when Dr. Ronald Hirsch makes his Monday Rounds live on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck, 10 Eastern, and sponsored by R1-RCM.
Literature is ripe with classic phrases that seem timelessly apropos. For example, take the partial federal government shutdown. For days, the phrase repeated in the
As I discussed recently, we have a go-live date for the Medicare Change of Status Notice of Feb. 14. Before reading on, stop and take
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
