Palliative Care and Hospice: Case Managers Face Haunting Challenges

Case managers and physicians approach palliative care from different perspectives.

There are many staffing models for case managers. A number of years ago, the trend leaned toward combining the activities of discharge planning and utilization instead of employing two individuals to look at the same chart.

Recently, the pendulum appears to be swinging back, with many health systems identifying that often, the duties associated with helping patients and families prepare for discharge from the hospital are hindered by the often-difficult conversations regarding utilization management.

Regardless of the model used, hospital case managers charged with assisting patients and families as they navigate down the harrowing road of deciding “what’s next?” face multiple challenges themselves.

One critical challenge comes from the collaboration (or lack thereof) with the patient’s provider. While case managers are having conversations with patients about expectations and wishes for their care, these same discussions may take a very different form when they involve the patient and physician. In fact, some might not be “discussions” at all. Whether due to physician misunderstanding of palliative care and hospice, reluctance to have such a conversation with the patient and family (at times due to a perception of “giving up” on the patient), or uncertainty about continuity of care by adding another provider into the mix, the topic of palliative care can be quickly glossed over – or never brought up at all.

This puts the case manager in a difficult position, both in scenarios in which the patient or family brings the topic up themselves, and when the case manager communicates that he or she feels strongly that palliative care would benefit the patient. While some hospitals allow bedside nurses and case managers to place an order on their own for a palliative care consult, others require the attending physician to place the order. Unfortunately, the latter can result in patients surrounded by a care team, even including other consultant physicians, who all feel strongly that the patient would benefit from a comprehensive discussion about palliative care’s goals and services – but who are powerless to provide it.

Families can also pose significant challenges for case managers and providers when it comes to considering palliative care or hospice. Especially in the acute hospital setting, even if the patient has been hospitalized multiple times before, there is often a sentiment that everything will be fine as soon as the patient recovers and is once again able to be discharged. Even with the best discharge plan put into place for the patient to follow up with their primary provider or a palliative care physician in the outpatient setting, it is not uncommon for patients to be re-hospitalized before this occurs.

Another difficulty with initiating this conversation in the hospital setting is that many times, the patient is being cared for by a hospitalist the patient and family have ever seen before. While hospitalists provide excellent care, and serve as an important bridge for outpatient primary care physicians, they lack the connection to patients created by multiple visits over multiple years.

Some hospitalists have overcome this barrier by evolving into stellar communicators with a strong understanding of palliative care and hospice, and a talent for presenting the information in a manner that patients and families readily interpret as another option for optimizing care. When working within a care team spearheaded by a physician such as this, case managers can simply walk through the door of opportunity created by the hospitalist, as opposed to fumbling with the key in the lock to see if the topic can be broached.

Case managers around the country applaud all initiatives that promote and encourage palliative care and hospice services for their patients, and all of us involved are anxious to see what’s beyond the horizon.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Juliet Ugarte Hopkins, MD, ACPA-C

Juliet B. Ugarte Hopkins, MD, ACPA-C is Medical Director of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., Immediate Past President of the American College of Physician Advisors, and CEO of Velvet Hammer Physician Advising LLC. Dr. Ugarte Hopkins practiced as a pediatric hospitalist for a decade and then developed the physician advisor role for case management, utilization, and clinical documentation at a three-hospital health system where she worked for nearly another decade. She is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board, author, and national speaker.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24