OIG Audits Getting Back in Gear

Federal contractors are paying particular attention to payment for COVID care.

It’s time to revisit a prediction regarding COVID-related audits. Months ago, it was proposed that any additional funds the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) authorized for payment related to COVID-19 care would be at high risk of audit and recoupment. At the time, audits were expected for HRSA (Health Resources and Services Administration, https://www.hrsa.gov/), telemedicine, and the 20-percent increased weight for a COVID diagnosis.

Several hospitals have now received audit notices from the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) for COVID-related claims. The OIG has begun auditing hospitals to “determine whether Medicare paid hospitals for these inpatient claims in accordance with federal requirements.” Make no mistake, the OIG is auditing provider billing, not payment. The OIG is not auditing Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) performance.

As part of this inpatient status audit, the OIG “requests” documents and completion of a questionnaire. Additionally, the OIG is auditing the qualification of individual claims for the 20-percent increase in MS-DRG weighting. In essence, this is a non-targeted audit of inpatient claims. As expected, once the records are in the hands of an auditor, the claim may be denied for any reason.

Readers will recall that after Sept. 1, 2020, any medical record with a COVID diagnosis must contain documentation of positive test results. The OIG’s letter indicated that the positive test must be the result of specified viral testing methods consistent with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines in effect at the time the test was performed. The tests used must have had Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval or emergency use authorization at the time of testing.

The OIG asks the hospital to confirm if it declined the payment of the 20-percent increase in weighting. If the hospital did decline the increase, the OIG requests a copy of the hospital’s communication with its MAC. The OIG also asks if the hospital subsequently rescinded its declining of the additional payment. As expected, the OIG requests written documentation of that.

It appears that the OIG is reinstituting its hospital inpatient audits. At this time, any inpatient claim bearing a COVID diagnosis is now at very high risk of audit. If you have billed a COVID diagnosis since Sept. 1, 2020, you should assume you will be audited. If you sought the 20-percent increase after that date, you should prepare to have these claims audited. Even if you declined the increase, COVID claims are still subject to audit, and you should still begin preparing.

The first step is risk assessment:

  • You should determine the volume of COVID claims submitted since Sept. 1, 2020 to assess potential impact to your hospital.
  • Next you should ensure that you can identify the specific type of test associated with each claim, and the FDA approval status of the testing methodology on the date the test was administered.
  • Next, you should assess the risk associated with other diagnoses in these claims, such as sepsis, respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, and renal failure. Any coded diagnoses that contribute to CCs or MCCs, or otherwise modify the DRG or reimbursement, will likely be scrutinized by the OIG’s medical reviewers. If the diagnoses do not conform to recognized criteria, you should expect DRG-validation denials.
  • Finally, medical necessity should be rigorously reviewed.

The next step is risk response. With assistance and guidance from your compliance team and legal counsel, you should determine how much additional review is warranted:

  • Zero- and one-midnight stays rarely have sufficient documentation to survive audit for inpatient reimbursement.
  • Three-midnight and longer stays should survive review, unless the record indicates that the stay is for a prohibited reason.
  • Two-midnight stays are much more complex. The outcome for these claims will be determined by the auditor’s assessment of the documentation of reasonableness.

These audit results will be the basis for additional reviews. If the OIG determines that you have a well-stocked pond, it will come back to fish again.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC

John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC is a licensed physician in several jurisdictions and is admitted to the California bar. He is also the founder of The Aegis Firm, a healthcare consulting firm providing consultative and litigation support on a wide variety of criminal and civil matters related to healthcare. He lectures frequently on black-letter health law, mediation, medical staff relations, and medical ethics, as well as patient and physician rights. Dr. Hall hopes to help explain complex problems at the intersection of medicine and law and prepare providers to manage those problems.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis Sequencing in Focus: From Documentation to Defensible Coding

Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.

March 26, 2026
I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24