New OIG Report on Health Risk Assessments

New OIG Report on Health Risk Assessments

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) recently issued a report titled “Medicare Advantage: Questionable Use of Health Risk Assessments Continues to Drive Up Payments to Plans by Billions.” This report interested me on several levels.

As a person rapidly approaching Medicare age – and I am sure you will hear more about this from me in the future – I found the statistics interesting.

In 2023, a total of 32 million Medicare enrollees, who compose about half of the 65.75 million Medicare beneficiaries, elected to enroll in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. The costs to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Medicare Part C were $448 billion of the total trillion dollars of Medicare cost, which seems to be just short of what the proportional costs would calculate out to be.

We use my cell-phone number as my father’s contact number, as he has advanced dementia. He is not able to answer his phone reliably, and he does not have the understanding or executive functioning to respond to a phone call from someone other than a loved one inquiring about his status.

As a result, I frequently get calls from UnitedHealthcare’s House Calls program. They are not affiliated with my father’s primary care provider (PCP).

They bill this as “an opportunity to ask questions and get answers about the things that matter most to you about your health.” They offer up to an hour of one-on-one time with a healthcare practitioner, a physical exam, healthcare screenings, a medication review, and an opportunity to get advice or education, and have your questions answered. At the end of the visit, you are supposed to get a personalized checklist of items to discuss with your PCP.

I do not think this accurately sums up their goals and what they accomplish. My take is that this is a mechanism to try to inventory a client’s medical conditions so the payor can maximize risk adjustment factors. The benefit is to UnitedHealthcare’s capitation, not to my father’s health. What do they think their nurse practitioner will unmask that a competent PCP would be heretofore unaware of?

When I decline on his behalf, because there is nothing to be gained for him, and it will just be a waste of my time, they offer to see him without me. Now exactly what information are they planning to derive from that visit?!

In fact, when he was in assisted living, I visited him one day and found a House Calls mug, magnet, print-out, and a Visa gift card. They had visited him without discussing it with me, and I suspect they didn’t get much valuable (or probably any) information. He probably said a lot of, “I don’t remember. You should ask my daughter.”

The OIG report notes that diagnoses reported only on enrollees’ health risk assessments (HRAs) and HRA-linked chart reviews resulted in an estimated $7.5 billion in MA risk-adjusted payments for 2023.

The authors point out that if a diagnosis is only found in an HRA and not noted in any following service, one of two likely scenarios are in play: either the diagnosis is in error, or the patient is not receiving necessary treatment for a valid condition. If diagnoses are added without intervention, follow-up care, or care coordination to address them, why should the provider/payor be allotted more Medicare dollars, presumably for the treatment of the chronic conditions?

A total of 13 health conditions resulted in 75 percent of the risk adjustment payments from HRAs and HRA-linked chart reviews. Polyneuropathies from diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes with complications, and secondary hyperaldosteronism (from heart failure, perhaps) were disproportionately discovered.

The top 20 MA companies had obvious target diagnoses that resulted in a substantially greater share of payments in comparison to the other 137 MA companies. Humana and UnitedHealth Group represented over $5 billion of payments. A total of 19,000 enrollees had no service records in 2022 other than a single in-home HRA.

OIG’s recommendations to CMS were that there should be actions associated with diagnoses that result from HRAs, that ongoing Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audits should be undertaken, and that the use of diagnoses reported only on in-home HRAs or chart reviews be restricted. The only recommendation that CMS agreed with was to determine whether select Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) are more prone to misuse among MA plans.

I am supportive of healthcare providers being thorough and regularly assessing a patient’s medical and social needs. I don’t think it should be for show or merely for financial gain, however. Our goal should be taking excellent care of patients, documenting it well, and having it coded accurately.

If we do that, the compensation should be commensurate with the effort and resources put into caring for the patient, and the risk-adjusted quality metrics should fall where they belong.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C

Erica Remer, MD, FACEP, CCDS, ACPA-C has a unique perspective as a practicing emergency physician for 25 years, with extensive coding, CDI, and ICD-10 expertise. As physician advisor for University Hospitals Health System in Cleveland, Ohio for four years, she trained 2,700 providers in ICD-10, closed hundreds of queries, fought numerous DRG clinical determination and medical necessity denials, and educated CDI specialists and healthcare providers with engaging, case-based presentations. She transitioned to independent consulting in July 2016. Dr. Remer is a member of the ICD10monitor editorial board and is the co-host on the popular Talk Ten Tuesdays weekly, live Internet radio broadcasts.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis Sequencing in Focus: From Documentation to Defensible Coding

Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.

March 26, 2026
I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24