New Appeal Process Proposal Brings Comments

New Appeal Process Proposal Brings Comments

I have spoken in the past about the new proposed appeal process for Medicare patients whose status has changed from inpatient to outpatient. When new rules are proposed, I like to browse the submitted comments to get a feel for the sentiment in the community. And in every case, there are very good comments submitted that ask very astute questions – and other comments that actually show how people really feel. 

And this proposed rule is no different.

So far, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has only posted 15 comments, and four of those are from some guy named Dr. Ronald Hirsch, who seems to have nothing else to do but flood CMS with questions. Now, of the others, several again discuss the problem with the three-day rule for Part A skilled nursing facility (SNF) access, and how patients whose status has changed currently lose that access (along with a request that CMS get rid of that). 

Another comment came from a hospital medical officer who was upset that outpatients get charged for their self-administered medications. And all of you have heard me say it time and time again: if a hospital is charging their patients, that’s on the hospital. In 2015, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) made it official that hospitals do not have to charge for those medications, so any hospital still doing so should simply stop the practice.

There is also a comment that the change from inpatient to outpatient should not happen because it results in higher costs for the patient. And of course, all of you know that I have talked about that in the past – and it’s simply not true. In most cases, inpatient care costs more. 

And as I have often seen, there was one comment that really stands out. Let me read part of it:

“I have been victimized by a situation wherein I was led to believe that my Medicare Part A would apply to my hospitalization. I first arrived when my bowel became obstructed and would not pass food. It became very serious over the night of the 23rd, and on the 24th, I was rushed to the hospital by ambulance with extreme pain. I was immediately admitted in emergency, vomited violently, and administered IV, given numerous scans, X-rays, etc. I was asked whether I had Medicare Part A and when I said yes, they said they were going to admit me into the hospital as an inpatient. I trusted them in this regard. I stayed overnight and spent a day in the hospital, leaving again at night around 11 p.m. on the 25th.. I had no notion that if I stayed there one more hour, perhaps my status would change! I was under the full impression that I would be covered by my Medicare Part A. It was only later that I got a letter dated the 27th, telling me that despite my inpatient status and all that I had been told, I was going to be denied Medicare Part A status.”

Continuing: “I was given no phone number or recourse to appeal what is clearly an unfair situation. I am entitled to Medicare as a senior citizen of the United States. This unilateral, unappealable decision will cost me at least $2,000 extra and needs to be corrected. I not only wish to comment herein but wish to see this situation corrected.”

Now, interestingly, this commenter attached the letter he received from the hospital, which actually was a very nice compliant self-denial notice, with the letter ending “please call the care management office listed below if you have any questions or concerns regarding this change.” That’s great, except there was no phone number anywhere to be found.

Now, will the new appeal process apply here? As proposed, because this patient was not transferred to an SNF, unless this patient has no Part B coverage, he will not be given appeal rights. But does he have a valid argument? Well, I would certainly love to see his medical records, because a bowel obstruction in most cases can have a two-midnight expectation, and his discharge at 11 p.m. could be viewed as an unexpected rapid recovery.   But of course, the biggest question is whether CMS will answer any of the questions from that Dr. Hirsch guy.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 19, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025
2026 IPPS Masterclass 3: Master MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2026 IPPS Masterclass Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.

August 14, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025
The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

The Two-Midnight Rule: New Challenges, Proven Strategies

RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.

June 19, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24