Major financial penalties loom for providers not following reporting requirements.
We are more than halfway through the first year of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), and a majority of clinicians still do not understand the program.
In fact, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reported that an estimated 40 percent of providers are unaware of the MACRA requirements, and even fewer provider extenders, such as nurse practitioners and nurses, understand the program.
The deadline to start tracking data under the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) is quickly approaching. CMS made some adjustments for more than 800,000 doctors who are getting a “pass” based on practice size and Medicare patient volume, but over 400,000 providers are being required to report under MIPS this year.
MACRA became law in 2015 with the Quality Payment Program. The affiliated financial penalty is to begin in 2019, based on 2017 compliance. Data reporting requirements kicked in on Oct. 2.
Just a reminder, under the MIPS Quality Payment Program: there will be a 4 percent penalty payment in 2019 for data not reported after Oct. 2, and each year that figure grows. At this point, if providers do not report by 2020, there will be a 9 percent reduction in payments. Under the Alternative Payment Model (APM, which most providers have elected not to consider, since it is high-risk, it seems like an Accoutable Care Organization operating under a modified bundled payment program, with significant stress on the coordination of care for the patient.
In spite of a great deal of information being readily available and the new buzz in the healthcare arena, again, still, a majority are not well-informed about MACRA. Maybe after the other mandates – such as those put in place by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), electronic medical records (EMRs), and bundled payments – no one is taking it seriously. Some thought the new Republican control of all three branches of government meant that they didn’t have to do much of anything. Unfortunately, many electronic health record (EHR) systems are not prepared to support the clinical care function operating under the new program. None report the requirements with MACRA.
Now, providers and EHR vendors are not the only guilty parties. CMS has not outlined exactly how providers will be judged under these two programs. One suggestion I would make is to review a web resource from the American Academy of Family Physicians MACRA Ready materials, available online at http://www.aafp.org/practice-management/payment/macraready.html.
Program Note: Listen to Lyman Sornberger discuss MACRA on Talk Ten Tuesdays today at 10 a.m. ET.
As of Jan. 1, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) initiated a three-year phase-out of the Inpatient-Only (IPO) List, which fundamentally reshapes how
For nearly a decade after the late-2000s Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) policy changes, work Relative Value Units (RVUs) felt like a stable
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
