In the 1934 movie “Death Takes a Holiday,” Death, played by the venerable Fredric March, takes a three-day holiday to find out why everyone fears him. During his respite, no one dies from disease or accidents.
Unlike in the movie, in real life Death doesn’t go on vacation but works day and night. Everyone alive knows this. You would hope that everyone would be ready to meet death when it comes – but that’s not always the case.
For those whose time is running out and will likely meet Death face-to-face in the next year, getting ready to pass on their own terms has gotten easier and simpler. The POLST (Physician Orders of Life-Saving Treatment) form allows the dying to to set the conditions of their passing. It is an innovative and effective program that gives patients the ability to set controls regarding how and when they die.
Who in healthcare doesn’t know about this life-changing form? Well, during a recent presentation on palliative care, I found out.
Standing on the rostrum last April, I pondered about even asking the question. I thought it was too simple. I thought it had too obvious an answer. From the speaker’s podium I surveyed the hand-raising pool of quality and utilzation professionals in the conference room. Anticipating a forest of hands to rise up, I decided to ask the question of the 232 people in the room:
“How many of you are familiar with the POLST form?”
Expecting a forest, I got just one tree: a single hand rose up.
I was astonished. I had hesitated to even put slides about the POLST form in my presentation. I assumed everyone was aware of it. It has been around for years, it has a website, a Google search results in 524,000 results, 47 out of 50 states have POLST programs, and both major medical journals and major newspapers had recently run articles on the topic.
But I shouldn’t have been stupified, because the estimated length of time for a practice-altering development to be implemented, prior to the advent of the Internet, was almost 17 years! It traditionally has taken that long for the general medical population to absorb and translate changes – but the specialty populations have a much shorter turnaround.
Since I live part-time in the world of palliative care, I became familiar with the POLST form early. I tracked our state’s adoption of its POLST form and I prostetylized for its use. However, for the POLST form to succeed, it needs more than proselytizers, it needs the medical congregation – the community physicians and nurse practicioners – to become informed believers.
So, what is this POLST form, with which 99.57 percent of my audience was unfamilar? It is one of two documents that can ensure that a patient’s treatment preferences are verified, updated, and most importantly, respected. The other document is the advanced directive, a.k.a. the living will. These forms do not compete with each other; they complement each other.
Both the POLST form and advanced directive document each patient’s goals of care and treatment preferences, but the preferences expressed in a living will are just that – only preferences. The POLST form, however, contains actionable, signed medical orders based on those preferences.
In the home, living wills inform EMTs what each patient’s preferences are, but it does not absolve them from following emergency protocols. The POLST form contains care providers’ orders that override protocols and allow EMTs in the field to act in accordance with patient wishes. In the hospital, physicians and nurses are likewise bound to follow the POLST orders.
The table from the the National POLST Paradigm website (www.polst.org) gives a brief comparison of the POLST form, along with the advanced directive:
One of the reasons my audience may not have heard about the POLST form is because it might be called something else in their state. Individual states vary, with the most common other names being the MOSLT, MOST, and POST. In my state, Delaware, it is called the DMOST. If you are wondering about what the POLST form’s name is in your state, you can easily find it online at http://polst.org/programs-in-your-state/.
There is another significant difference between the POLST form and living wills that is changing the medicolegal landscape: the concept of “wrongful life.” Traditionally, “wrongful death” was the only focus of lawsuits, because the law did not consider survival to be a harmful outcome. Now a patient can be “wrongful alive” as well as “wrongfully dead.”
When a POLST form orders for DNR/DNI are not respected and CPR results in an unwanted survival, patients and their families are suing due to “wrongful life,” i.e., being kept alive against their expressed wishes and healthcare provider’s POLST orders. POLST forms are powerful documents that translate patient wishes into healthcare directives.
The POLST is here to stay, and while it has not obviated the need for an advance directive, it has revolutionized how patients’ preferences for care are achieved. The POLST is easy to complete for patients, easy to interpret by caregivers, and easy to find by EMTs. Most POLST forms hang on refrigerators for easy access in a crisis.
The POLST form has tremendous potential: the potential to instigate meaningful end-of-life discussions between patients, families, and doctors; the potential to save countless sorrows and dollars; and the potential to allow our patients who are facing death to decide how they will meet it.
In the end, the POLST form is all about the end. It allows our patients to write the scripts for their own deaths. Most patients live the life they must, while the POLST gives all patients the means to die the death they choose.
It is a bummer when you get hoisted on the petard of intellectual inconsistency. Whether it is different medical professionals with different approaches to a
In a recent article, I described a documentation environment governed by two distinct and often competing controlling systems. The first is the regulatory framework established
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
