Emergency spending bill signed by President Trump on March 6, paves the way for Medicare to pay for telehealth services.
Outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has forced Medicare to begin paying for telehealth services. Payment for telehealth was built into the emergency spending bill signed by the President on March 6. The change in rules appears in Division B of the Act, titled “Telehealth Services during Certain Emergency Periods Act of 2020.”
Section 102 gives the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) authority to “temporarily waive or modify application of certain Medicare requirements with respect to telehealth services furnished during certain emergency periods.”
Payments “may only be paid to an originating site” that already is qualified to receive Medicare money. “Telehealth” does not include merely making a telephone call. In order to be paid by Medicare, “use of a telephone . . . [qualifies] only if such telephone has audio and video capabilities that are used for two-way, real-time interactive communication.”
The new law limits the types of providers that can be paid for providing telehealth. It states that a “qualified provider [is] . . . a physician or practitioner . . . who furnished [to the patient] . . . an item or service for which payment was made . . . during the three-year period [preceding the use of telehealth] . . . or . . . is in the same practice . . . of a physician or practitioner . . . who furnished such an item or service” during that period.
This means that no new type of medical service will be paid by Medicare if delivered by telemedicine. Only if the patient has already been receiving the service during the immediately preceding three years will it qualify for payment.
It is not necessary, however, that the same provider deliver the healthcare. It can be delivered to the patient by any provider who “is in the same practice” as the provider who gave the healthcare previously. The patient must have previously received the healthcare. This leaves out new patients.
This modification in payment policy only applies in emergency areas and during the emergency period. Emergencies are declared by the President, and in addition, it must be a public health emergency declared by the HHS Secretary (not simply any type of national emergency)(§102(b)).
Readers of RACmonitor and others in the healthcare industry might wish to pay special attention to the level of success with telehealth services during this emergency. There may be important lessons for the future, and these might lead to a change in policy, making telehealth services more viable under Medicare.
It’s no secret to any of us that there has been quite a bit of recent disagreement between the opposing sides of the political aisle
I’m going to skip over the topic of the hour with the government shutdown and address two actions the federal government has taken in the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
