Medicare has not been paying its fair share of medical costs for decades.
Medicare for all: what would it do to hospitals? Hospital CFOs tell us that Medicare does not pay as much as other payers, and that Medicare for all would result in many hospitals closing.
To answer this question, we should start by going back into history. When Medicare was introduced in 1966, the government reached out to the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association to come up with a way to determine what to pay hospitals for treating patients. Included in this analysis was the reality that Medicare made up a small sliver of all patients. Blue Cross created a “Cost Report.” It was a simple computation of inpatient and outpatient costs that was divided by total patient days to get a “cost per diem.” This cost per day was multiplied by Medicare days to compute an allowable cost.
For-profit hospitals complained that they need a profit margin, so Medicare created a “return on equity” factor. So nonprofit hospitals got cost, and for-profits got cost plus a return on equity.
Medicare quickly figured out a sad truth. There wasn’t enough Medicare money.
For Medicare’s limited inpatient “routine” or “room and board” costs, they created a “routine cost limit.” They would pay ancillary inpatient and outpatient sums at cost, but limit costs related to “room and board.”
For just a few years, in the early 1980s, Medicare paid at inpatient cost subject to a “per discharge” limit.
But Medicare stopped paying a return on equity. The Inpatient Prospective Payment System was implemented, meaning all direct connection to costs were now gone, but however you sliced it, Medicare was now paying less than the cost of treating patients. If Medicare did not pay its fair share, then hospitals would make it up on other payers. This is known as cost shifting.
What about current data? We took the latest Medicare cost reports from across the country. We compared only acute-care hospitals. We took net revenue as reported on worksheet G3 and divided it by total patient days from worksheet S3, line 14. The result was average net revenue of $5,947.42 per patient day. Then we took Medicare payments from worksheets E, Part A and E Part B. We added back coinsurance (very generous to Medicare).
We then divided that amount by Medicare days reported on worksheet S3 of the cost reports. The result was Medicare payments of $3,877.34 per day. This means that Medicare is paying only about 65 percent what would have to be paid for hospitals to have the same net revenue under “Medicare for all.”
In conclusion, any “Medicare for all” program will have to contend with the truth that Medicare has not been paying its fair share of medical costs for decades.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) can’t seem to catch a break of late. 2023 has been a tough year for the agency,
There has been a lot of recent chatter about the applicability of the Two-Midnight Rule to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. If ever there was rampant
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.
A massive task lies ahead! Now’s the time to start preparing your case management and utilization review teams for successful implementation of changes contained in the 2024 IPPS, OPPS and MPFS rules.
Gain clarity on billing, patient notifications, and discharge appeal rights in social admissions. Join our webcast for essential insights and strategies to navigate this complex landscape, ensuring financial stability and optimal patient care.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides tried-and-true strategies and insight into outpatient in hospital bed stays including determining the applicable definition, who uses it, and when and how to bill for this circumstance, solidified with concrete case examples and expert insight.
Explore comprehensive guidelines and best practices for secondary diagnosis coding in our illuminating webcast. Delve into the intricacies of accurately assigning secondary diagnosis codes to ensure precise medical documentation. Learn how to navigate complex scenarios and adhere to coding regulations while enhancing coding proficiency. Our expert-led webcast covers essential insights, including documentation requirements, sequencing strategies, and industry updates. Elevate your coding skills and stay current with the latest coding advancements so you can determine the correct DRG assignment to optimize reimbursement, support medical decision-making, and maintain compliance.
Enhance your inpatient coding precision and revenue with Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing. Join our expert-led webcast to conquer the challenges of principal diagnosis selection and sequencing. We’ll decode the intricacies of ICD-10-CM guidelines, equipping you with a clear grasp of the rules and the official UHDDS principal diagnosis definition. Uncover the crucial role of coding conventions, master the sequencing of related conditions, and confidently tackle cases with equally valid principal diagnoses.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY24 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, plus insights, analysis and answers to questions from the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2024 IPPS Summit will feature a review of FY24 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by senior healthcare consultant Laurie Johnson, with bonus insights and analysis from two acclaimed subject matter experts
Copyright © 2023 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
