Medicare has not been paying its fair share of medical costs for decades.
Medicare for all: what would it do to hospitals? Hospital CFOs tell us that Medicare does not pay as much as other payers, and that Medicare for all would result in many hospitals closing.
To answer this question, we should start by going back into history. When Medicare was introduced in 1966, the government reached out to the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association to come up with a way to determine what to pay hospitals for treating patients. Included in this analysis was the reality that Medicare made up a small sliver of all patients. Blue Cross created a “Cost Report.” It was a simple computation of inpatient and outpatient costs that was divided by total patient days to get a “cost per diem.” This cost per day was multiplied by Medicare days to compute an allowable cost.
For-profit hospitals complained that they need a profit margin, so Medicare created a “return on equity” factor. So nonprofit hospitals got cost, and for-profits got cost plus a return on equity.
Medicare quickly figured out a sad truth. There wasn’t enough Medicare money.
For Medicare’s limited inpatient “routine” or “room and board” costs, they created a “routine cost limit.” They would pay ancillary inpatient and outpatient sums at cost, but limit costs related to “room and board.”
For just a few years, in the early 1980s, Medicare paid at inpatient cost subject to a “per discharge” limit.
But Medicare stopped paying a return on equity. The Inpatient Prospective Payment System was implemented, meaning all direct connection to costs were now gone, but however you sliced it, Medicare was now paying less than the cost of treating patients. If Medicare did not pay its fair share, then hospitals would make it up on other payers. This is known as cost shifting.
What about current data? We took the latest Medicare cost reports from across the country. We compared only acute-care hospitals. We took net revenue as reported on worksheet G3 and divided it by total patient days from worksheet S3, line 14. The result was average net revenue of $5,947.42 per patient day. Then we took Medicare payments from worksheets E, Part A and E Part B. We added back coinsurance (very generous to Medicare).
We then divided that amount by Medicare days reported on worksheet S3 of the cost reports. The result was Medicare payments of $3,877.34 per day. This means that Medicare is paying only about 65 percent what would have to be paid for hospitals to have the same net revenue under “Medicare for all.”
In conclusion, any “Medicare for all” program will have to contend with the truth that Medicare has not been paying its fair share of medical costs for decades.
With little fanfare, last week the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced another Review Choice Demonstration Project. Joining the ongoing Review Choice Demonstration
Last week I wrote about the ongoing issue of Medicare Advantage (MA) denials related to appropriate transfer to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides tried-and-true strategies and insight into outpatient in hospital bed stays including determining the applicable definition, who uses it, and when and how to bill for this circumstance, solidified with concrete case examples and expert insight.
Practical solutions for CDM departments to protect your hospital’s revenue.
This webcast teaches hospitals how to comply with CMS price transparency rules and compare their rates with peer hospitals. It covers creating a compliant machine-readable file, comparing negotiated rates, and improving pricing decisions.
The No Surprises Act (NSA) presents a challenge for hospitals and providers who must provide Good Faith Estimates (GFEs) for all schedulable services for self-pay and uninsured patients. Compliance is necessary, but few hospitals have been able to fully comply with the requirements despite being a year into the NSA. This webcast provides an overview of the NSA/GFE policy, its impact, and a step-by-step process to adhere to the requirements and avoid non-compliance penalties.
This expert-guided webcast will showcase tips for providers to ensure appropriate capture of the work performed for a visit. Comprehensive examples will be given that demonstrate documentation gaps and how to educate providers on the documentation necessary to appropriately assign a level of service. You will gain clarification on answers regarding emergency department and urgent care coding circumstances as well as a review of how/when it is appropriate to code for E&M in radiology and more.
Set yourself up for financial and compliance success with expert guidance that breaks down the impactful changes including MS-DRG methodology, surgical hierarchy updates, and many new technology add-on payments (NTAPs). Identify areas of potential challenge ahead of time and master solutions for all 2024 Proposed IPPS changes.
Do you struggle with selecting and appending the correct modifier for your medical claims? Join our must-attend webinar, “Mastering Modifier Usage: Preventing Denials and Ensuring Compliance” to reduce claim denials and improve your reimbursement rates.
Kay Piper reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDISs on important information in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2023 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Copyright © 2023 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
