There has been a lot of recent chatter about the applicability of the Two-Midnight Rule to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. If ever there was rampant confusion about something, it is this. The Final Rule that formally obligated the MA plans, CMS-4201-F, was finalized in April, with the rule stating that the regulations became effective June 5.
But as many have found out, none of the MA plans changed one thing on June 5 – and they were right not to, because the next line in the rule states that “the provisions in this rule are applicable to coverage beginning January 1, 2024.” Now, once again, I would defer to my lawyer colleagues to explain how a rule can have an effective date and a drastically different applicability date, but that’s the way it is. (I suspect that ambiguity is a feature of legal documents and not a flaw, as non-lawyers often view it.)
And I hate to side with the MA plans, but at least for the two-midnight provision, it actually makes sense. Each year MA plans submit bids to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to get contracts to serve as a Part C entity. I suspect there is a giant room full of actuaries that do all sorts of predictions on cost. And for the current calendar year, the MA plans are paid based on their bids submitted back in 2022. And as we all know, back in 2022, the MA plans’ expectation was that for 2023, they would be able to continue to blatantly ignore the Two-Midnight Rule (as they have done, with CMS permission, since 2013). So that means requiring the plans to start following the Two-Midnight Rule in the middle of 2023 would just not be fair to the MA plans, as there would be significantly more inpatient claims to pay, and that would endanger their multi-billion-dollar profits.
As a result, the passage of the rule in April with applicability in 2024 allows them to appropriately adjust their 2024 bids that were due in June to compensate for the costs for all the new inpatient claims. Now, before you attack me, yes, I know that the MA plans are going to do everything they can to avoid approving inpatient admissions, just as they do now. The gamebook may change, but the objective will remain the same.
Interestingly, the confusion over the applicability is not limited to providers. When MA medical directors are asked if they are or will be following the Two-Midnight Rule, the responses vary from “what’s that?” to “oh, that does not apply to us” to “our legal team says our contract with you overrides that.” Ignorance certainly is blissful.
Now, regardless of what the MA plans may say, they will have to follow the Two-Midnight Rule as of January. They must honor the Inpatient-Only List, and there is no ambiguity there. Likewise, they can no longer use their proprietary retrospect-o-scope and deny inpatient admissions when patients die, leave against medical advice, or transfer out. Likewise, they must allow you to consider time spent at a transferring hospital in your counting of midnights.
On the other hand, you can bet they will put all their efforts into claiming that a patient doesn’t actually have a two-midnight expectation, or that the second midnight is not medically necessary, or that the risk is not high enough for the case-by-case exception to apply.
And I will have to admit, in some cases they will be correct. There is tremendous variation in medical care around the country, and often within the same city. How do we address this? Think objectively. Use the medical literature and professional society guidelines. Use your commercial guideline tools like MCG Care Guidelines – not to determine admission status, but the need for hospital care.
And of course, the best and likely most effective strategy will be to get your doctors to justify their inpatient admission decisions and risk assessments in writing. What are they worried about? What are they planning to do? How long will it take? What risk factors place the patient at higher risk than other patients with the same condition?
That will be easy, right?
Given the vast quantity of information published by the federal government, Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), consultants, and others, it can be easy to lose track
The first piece of news for today is that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has finally released a new version of the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
