Oct. 8-14 is National Fire Prevention Week. The diagnosis codes for burns are found in Chapter 19 (Injury, Poisoning, and Certain Other Consequences of External Causes) of ICD-10-CM. The Index entry for burns includes the non-essential modifiers of electricity, flame, hot gas, liquid, or hot object; radiation; steam; and thermal. Another Index entry is corrosion, which includes the non-essential modifiers of injury: acid, caustic, chemical, lime, external, and internal. Both entries are organized by anatomic site and degree of burn. According to the Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines, burns of the eye and internal organs are classified by site, but not degree.
The sequencing of burns is by the highest degree when more than one burn is present. When internal and external burns are present, the sequencing will be based on the circumstances of admission. When the patient is admitted with burns and related conditions, such as smoke inhalation and/or respiratory failure, the circumstances of admission govern the selection of the principal diagnosis or first-listed diagnosis.
Burns of the same anatomic site and laterality are coded to the highest degree. Non-healing burns are coded as acute burns. An infected burn is coded as a burn with an additional code for the infection. When multiple burns are present, code each anatomic site separately. The code for multiple sites should only be used when the medical record documentation does not specify the individual sites.
Code the extent of the burn(s) using T31 (Burns classified according to the extent of body surface involved) or T32 (Corrosions classified according to the extent of body surface involved). The estimation of the involved body surface is based on the rule of 9s: head and neck – 9 percent, anterior or posterior trunk – 18 percent, anterior or posterior leg – 9 percent, each arm – 9 percent, and genitalia is 1 percent.
Next, the coder should assign diagnosis codes for external causes, which identify the source of the burn as well as the place where it occurred. Your state data commission may provide guidance regarding external cause code reporting. For example, I am from the state of Pennsylvania, and the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) requires external cause codes on every encounter that a trauma code is reported. This requirement is different from the Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines, which directs providers to report the external cause code on the initial encounter. It is important to note the data reporting requirements for this topic.
The reporting of burns/corrosions is part of trauma reporting. This information is circulated beyond the adjudication of claims, so it is important to be accurate.
Be safe out there!
Resources:
ICD-10-CM, 2024
Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines, ICD-10-CM, 2024
While many in hospitals find understanding the new regulations on Medicare Advantage (MA) plan denials challenging, it appears that the payers are also having a
As of Jan. 1, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) initiated a three-year phase-out of the Inpatient-Only (IPO) List, which fundamentally reshapes how
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
