Although specifics remain under negotiation, early outlines and House resolutions suggest that Medicaid will face significant reductions, likely through a combination of structural funding changes rather than simple across-the-board cuts.
The resolution by the House Budget Committee calls for $880 billion in savings across healthcare entitlement programs over the next decade. Medicaid, one of the largest non-defense expenditures, is almost certainly included. Analysts anticipate that reductions will come not from eliminating Medicaid outright, but by strategically targeting areas where states and providers currently receive enhanced payments or greater federal matching funds.
Medicaid DSH (Disproportionate Share Hospital) Payments:
Historically, DSH payments support hospitals that treat large numbers of low-income and uninsured patients. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), DSH cuts were scheduled but repeatedly delayed. In a more fiscally conservative environment, the Trump administration could allow these cuts to proceed — or even accelerate them. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) data show DSH payments total approximately $12 billion annually (Medicaid.gov).
Hypothesis: A 20-30 percent immediate reduction to DSH payments could yield $2.4–$3.6 billion per year in federal savings, disproportionately affecting urban safety-net hospitals.
Directed Payments:
Directed payments — supplemental payments states make to providers under managed care arrangements — have grown sharply in recent years. CMS has flagged concerns about their transparency and effectiveness (MACPAC.gov).
Hypothesis: CMS could impose stricter approval criteria, cap annual growth, or require that new directed payment programs be offset by reductions elsewhere. A conservative cap, say limiting growth to no more than 2% per year, could save billions nationally without an outright ban.
Federal Medicaid Matching Rate (FMAP):
Under current law, the federal government matches state Medicaid spending according to a formula tied to state income levels, with poorer states receiving higher matches. The COVID-era enhanced FMAP (a 6.2 percentage point increase) expired in 2023, but some lingering higher rates exist through special programs.
Hypothesis: A uniform 1–2 percent FMAP reduction would immediately shift billions of dollars in Medicaid costs back to states. For instance, Florida (current FMAP ~61%) would have to cover an additional $600 million annually for Medicaid programs with a 2 percent FMAP reduction (KFF.org).
States that expanded Medicaid under the ACA — such as California, New York, and Illinois — would likely see sharper financial pressure, particularly if FMAP rates are reduced and DSH cuts proceed simultaneously. Non-expansion states, while somewhat shielded, would still feel the impact via reduced federal funding for baseline Medicaid populations.
Hospitals and healthcare providers would bear significant risks, especially in rural and urban low-income areas. The Commonwealth Fund estimates that cuts in Medicaid and SNAP could cost the healthcare sector nearly 500,000 jobs in 2026 alone (Healthcare Dive).
Despite the cuts aligning with fiscal conservative goals, not all Republicans are on board. Legislators from rural states heavily dependent on Medicaid DSH and supplemental payments may push for exemptions or special treatment. Meanwhile, Democratic leaders like Senator Cory Booker are preparing to characterize the cuts as a direct attack on working families.
President Trump himself has offered mixed messaging — calling for eliminating “waste, fraud, and abuse” while promising to protect Medicaid beneficiaries. This leaves room for targeted cuts focused on payments to institutions and states rather than eliminating individual benefits.
The final structure of Medicaid cuts for 2026 remains uncertain. However, a conservative projection would expect a mix of DSH payment reductions, new caps or limitations on directed payments, and a modest across-the-board FMAP decrease. The cumulative effect could significantly strain state budgets and hospital systems, particularly in states that rely heavily on supplemental federal Medicaid funding. Negotiations throughout the remainder of 2025 will reveal whether these hypothetical scenarios become fiscal realities.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
As we conclude National Case Management Week 2025 with the theme of “Guiding Journeys,” we are making a point of celebrating case management professionals who
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous 2022 decision striking down the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) differential 340B payment rates, providers faced a
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
