The news cycle never seems to rest. First, a bill has been introduced in Congress to once again try to get observation days to count for the three-day stay requirement for Part A skilled nursing facility (SNF) coverage by Medicare.
Similar bills have been proposed for over 10 years and never get anywhere, so I have little faith that this one will be different. In addition, it makes no sense to limit it to counting observation days. Many Medicare beneficiaries would benefit from SNF care without any hospital stay.
We simply need Congress to realize that medical care in 2023 is not the same as in 1965, and the whole three-day inpatient stay requirement needs to go away.
I also have an update on the Livanta memo about short inpatient stays that I have been discussing for the last two weeks. I was looking through my files and noted that in March 2023, Livanta released a report on their short-stay inpatient audits that they had performed up to that time. And to my amazement, they reported that they had denied 11 short inpatient stays with the diagnosis of melena and 11 with a diagnosis of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. That’s the exact circumstances of one of the case examples in their memo.
In addition, they denied 10 cases with non-ST elevation MI, 10 admissions with ventricular tachycardia, and amazingly, 10 with complete heart block. Those results from earlier this year are in complete opposition to what the memo outlines as acceptable inpatient admissions. It is hard to argue that a patient with ventricular tachycardia or complete heart block is not at high risk of an adverse event. Of course, there are no case details, simply the primary diagnosis, but if they allow inpatient admission for a patient with resolved angioedema, how could they deny complete heart block?
But the bigger news is that on Friday afternoon, Aug. 8, Nina Youngstrom’s newsletter, the Report on Medicare Compliance, reported that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) confirmed to her in writing that they had reviewed the Livanta memo prior to publication.
That is huge.
If CMS did not support the case examples, they would not have let Livanta release it.
Now, the talk on discussion groups is that most don’t trust Livanta to abide by this, and I am also mildly skeptical, but knowing CMS reviewed this should go a long way to reducing hesitation at least about admitting all emergent cholecystitis and appendicitis as inpatient, if nothing else. Get a copy of her article and read it.
This new information from Livanta also brings up a fascinating proposal relayed to me by a hospital revenue cycle leader. Over the last year, they have had more than a few Medicare patients who were admitted as inpatients for cholecystitis or appendicitis and had a one-day stay, whereby the hospital then self-denied and rebilled to Part B. This person is considering refunding the Part B payment, then filing a corrected claim based on the inpatient order. That will get them the DRG that Livanta states is the appropriate payment and get an additional $7,000+ per case. In fact, now that Livanta has provided these examples, maybe everyone should go back and look at their short stays that were self-denied after discharge. Now, what is unclear is how this would be viewed. If you followed the requirements for self-denial with utilization review (UR) committee scrutiny and patient notification, what’s the process to reverse that? I honestly don’t know.
One last topic for today. I was contacted by a hospital asking how CMS calculates length of stay (LOS). The concern was that her hospital leaders calculate it from the start of care to discharge, then compare that to the Medicare GMLOS for the DRG.
Well, CMS uses the date of the inpatient admission for LOS calculations and ignores any outpatient or observation days: exactly the opposite of what her leaders do. As I told this person, measuring something this way is statistical malpractice. The only way they can have an LOS better than the GMLOS is to discharge unstable patients, which would be medical malpractice.
I hope this person can resolve this; it’s really senseless.
While the coverage of telehealth is definitely a good thing, it has caused needless confusion. I would like to address a little of that today.
In the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) ongoing attempts to conquer fraud, waste, and abuse, it launched the WISeR (Wasteful and Inappropriate Service
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
