New CDC mask guidance, plus release of the CMS OPPS proposed rule highlight week in the nation’s capital.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is under pressure to revise its guidance and recommend that vaccinated people go back to wearing masks in public. As you may remember, in May, the CDC changed its guidance to say that only non-vaccinated individuals needed to wear masks and maintain social distance. However, deaths due to COVID have increased nearly 50 percent over the past week, to an average of nearly 250 a day.
In the face of rising COVID cases, Los Angeles has brought back its mask mandate for both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals; this morning, St. Louis did the same.
This past weekend, Dr. Anthony Fauci said that the federal government is considering a change in the recommendations, but for now, the CDC says it is staying with its current guidance that vaccinated people need not wear masks. The CDC has emphasized that local government can and should make different decisions, based on their own numbers.
In related news, this week the American Hospital Association (AHA) began encouraging hospitals to require their employees to get vaccinated. The New York Times has reported that a quarter of all hospital employees remain unvaccinated.
Finally, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released its 2022 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) proposed rule last week. In it, the administration suggested upping the penalty against hospitals that don’t comply with the transparency rule that has been in effect since January of this year. The rule requires hospitals to upload spreadsheets that list negotiated rates with each of its payors, and it’s those spreadsheets – or machine-readable files – that hospitals are dragging their feet on.
According to one recent report, less than 6 percent of hospitals are in compliance with the requirements, and many hospitals indicated that they were choosing to pay the $300-per-day penalty instead of complying. The OPPS rule released last week proposed upping that to $5,500 a day for hospitals with more than 30 beds. That would mean a $2 million fine for a hospital that remained out of compliance for a year.
The transparency rules come from a single sentence in former President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, from which the Trump Administration created multiple requirements for both hospitals and insurers. Those requirements survived court challenges and heavy lobbying by industry opponents, and now the Biden Administration has signaled that it too is serious about enforcing them.
An aside here: in this day and age, can you imagine any policy initiative in any industry that is not only agreed upon, but also championed through three radically different presidential administrations?
So why are both sides of the aisle eager for these requirements, while providers and payers are pushing back on them?
There’s a lot at stake: making healthcare pricing transparent, public, and free will have a tremendous impact on provider-payer contract negotiations, hospital pricing, and payor reimbursement. New companies have already popped up that are gathering this data, then analyzing and monetizing it. As we’ve seen, the press is already picking up on some of the more irrational and egregious pricing that has been made public, and we’ll see even more of this as more of the information is published.
In short, transparency requirements are here to stay, they are going to impact the way hospitals and insurers do business, and they’ll be a part of the national conversation on healthcare for many years to come.
Programming Note: Listen to Matthew Albright’s legislative update, sponsored by Zelis, Mondays on Monitor Mondays, 10 Eastern.
As the federal government shutdown drags on, an alarming message began circulating across the healthcare community: “physicians won’t get paid until the government reopens.” The
“PAYGO” (Pay-As-You-Go) refers to a budget enforcement rule designed to impose fiscal discipline: when lawmakers pass legislation that increases mandatory spending or reduces revenue without
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
