Just before Congress adjourned for 2023, lawmakers sent another in a series of letters to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) expressing “serious concerns” regarding implementation of the No Surprises Act (NSA). The letter accused CMS of not properly implementing key pieces of the Act and suggested that the agency strayed from enactment as Congress had intended.
Little did anyone know that the committee’s letter would turn out to be a harbinger for a flurry of activity on the NSA – in particular from the courts and federal regulators.
Last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a New York surgeon’s lawsuit that sought to overturn the entire NSA.
The failed lawsuit claimed that the NSA interferes with providers’ rights to sue patients for the full value of their emergency medical services. However, this is just one of multiple lawsuits that may yet impact CMS’s implementation of the NSA.
Meanwhile, the Biden Administration recently announced that there is no plan to publish any rules on the NSA’s Advanced Explanation of Benefits (AEOB), or Good Faith Estimate (GFE) provisions. Last year, the Administration announced that an AEOB rule would be published early in 2024, but it now seems that this is not going to happen.
Additionally, last November, CMS released a lengthy proposed rule that would overhaul the NSA’s independent dispute resolution (IDR) process by making significant technical/procedural changes.
The period for the public to submit comments to CMS on the proposal was supposed to last until Jan. 2, but due to such high demand for submitting additional comments, coupled with the many technical components in the rule to comment on, CMS recently reopened the submission period for an additional two weeks; it now closes next Monday, Feb. 5.
There were over 90 individual comments submitted to CMS on the proposal during the first open submission period, many of which had common takeaways.
For example, providers strongly suggested a penalty in instances in which a payor fails to respond in a timely fashion to a request to negotiate reimbursement for surprise bills, while health plans took issue with some of the planned updates to the federal IDR portal, such as proposed requirements that plans submit much more information into the portal throughout the IDR process than is currently required.
And so, the No Surprises Act continues to generate news.
Now, one last related story: the percentage increase for calculating the qualifying payment amount (QPA) for items and services furnished under NSA protections was updated for 2024 in the last couple weeks by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
You may recall that the QPA is considered the median in-network rate; it’s a critical component of the calculations used by payors to reimburse providers for NSA-protected services and a vital data point for arbiters to review during the IDR process.
If my examples aren’t enough to convince you to focus more on everything going on with the NSA, I’ll sweeten the pot, so to speak, and close with this…
Consider the following two stats from a recent CMS NSA summary and a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO):
The bottom line? Perhaps we should call the NSA the law that never sleeps: It’s far from set in stone, and between Congress, CMS, the Administration, and the courts, implementation continues to experience changes and challenges on multiple fronts. Don’t let its momentum creep up on you.
While the coverage of telehealth is definitely a good thing, it has caused needless confusion. I would like to address a little of that today.
Compliance teams get nervous when rules are not followed. And when an expired form is used, they get really nervous. Thankfully, there is one fewer
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
