Latest News: Development of a National Provider Directory

Back in June, I was on the Monitor Mondays broadcast discussing the initial momentum within the Trump Administration for a single, national provider directory.

Now, after seeing a small flurry of activity over the past few weeks, I thought an update might be warranted.

The long-debated idea of a sole, national provider directory from a singular authority, which dates back to 2022 and the Biden Administration, is taking its first concrete steps forward. Following multiple public forums and stakeholder engagement efforts several months ago, as well as the launch of the “Make Health Tech Great Again” initiative, which revealed provider directory ambitions, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has now expanded its Medicare Plan Finder tool, which helps consumers shop between plans, to include Medicare Advantage provider directory information.

And last week, the agency also quietly issued four proof-of-concept awards to vendors to help build what could become a National Directory of Healthcare (NDH).

As a quick reminder, some of the typical talking points used to promote the need for a national directory include the idea that provider directories today are fragmented and frequently inaccurate — a persistent source of “ghost network” problems where plans list clinicians or facilities that are no longer in network or are no longer practice.

And just a couple weeks ago, a report from the Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) found that many Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medicaid managed care plans have limited behavioral health provider networks, with up to 99 percent of behavioral health listings in some directories qualifying as “ghosts.”

That inaccuracy can be quite problematic for beneficiaries trying to find in-network care and creates administrative headaches for providers and plans that must continually reconcile directory listings. As a result, the feds maintain that a centralized, interoperable directory holds promise for cleaner data, fewer surprise out-of-network encounters, and a single point of truth for healthcare provider data.

So, what has CMS been up to since June?

In August, the federal agency said the Contract Year 2026 Medicare Plan Finder would include MA provider directory information and other consumer-facing enhancements. CMS described that it was considering using a third-party vendor to populate the Plan Finder with in-network provider and facility data as a potential operational approach.

Then, in late September, CMS followed through, posting multiple small contracts to four separate companies to run proof-of-concept work exploring elements of a national directory. The awards, made public at the beginning of this month, are intended to test technical approaches, data models, and governance ideas rather than to deliver a finished product.

Current reporting indicates that vendors under consideration include large data and analytics firms such as Availity, the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH), Palantir, and Gainwell Technologies.

While inclusion of provider directory information in the Medicare Plan Finder is actively moving forward, other regulatory elements have been delayed allowing more time for stakeholder input and to balance accuracy requirements with administrative burden.

In short: The Plan Finder will start showing provider lists, but the administration’s larger, National Directory of Healthcare providers will be an iterative effort. CMS has more work to come in this space, but they have clearly moved from conceptual talk to testing.


The convergence of key Medicare Plan Finder enhancements and small-scale vendor proofs represent the first pieces of tangible progress toward a long-sought infrastructure goal that, if executed well, could simplify care navigation and reduce discrepancies between patients and in-network providers.

But whether a national provider directory operated by the government will solve the deeper problems of data accuracy and governance depends on the technical results of these vendor proofs and the policy choices CMS makes next.

References:

  1. https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/healthcare-information-technology/ehrs/cms-advances-national-provider-directory-with-4-1m-contracts/
  2. CMS signals interest in Palantir for national provider directory project  | FedScoop
  3. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/white-house-tech-leaders-commit-create-patient-centric-healthcare-ecosystem
  4. Medicare Advantage open enrollment provider directory mired in errors – The Washington Post
  5. https://oig.hhs.gov/reports/all/2025/many-medicare-advantage-and-medicaid-managed-care-plans-have-limited-behavioral-health-provider-networks-and-inactive-providers/
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Adam Brenman

Adam Brenman is a Sr. Gov’t Affairs Liaison at Zelis Healthcare. He previously served as Manager of Public Policy at WellCare Health Plans, where he led an analyst team in review, analysis, and development of advocacy materials related to state and federal legislation/regulatory guidance. He holds a master’s degree in Public Policy & Administration from Northwestern University and has also worked as a government affairs rep/lobbyist for a national healthcare provider association.

Related Stories

Goodbye Shutdown, Hello Funding

Well, it’s what we’ve all been waiting for… In a late-night move last Wednesday, Nov. 12, President Trump signed the Continuing Appropriations Act (CAA) of

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24