Over the past few years, our utilization management (UM) team has been hard at work to shift the habits of admitting physicians when it comes to assigning appropriate admission status.
Nothing like a pandemic to create a utilization management nightmare.
Mustering confidence amid so many unknowns associated with COVID-19 has proved challenging. Guiding providers to make the right status decision for a COVID-19 patient, considering ever-changing insurance waivers, government regulations, skilled nursing facility (SNF) closures, and the progressive and constant evolution of managing the disease itself is no small feat.
When an onslaught of patients was transferred to our hospitals from community SNFs overrun by COVID-19 – including COVID-19-negative patients – it presented a conundrum as to what their status at the hospital should be. In the heat of the moment, I became desperate. I started feverishly composing COVID-19 admission guidelines reflective of our health system’s circumstances, with the help of collegial advice inclusive of the RAC Relief listserv and my steadfast, battle-worn UM director. Of course, as you can guess, as soon as I finalized these guidelines, new information became available, prompting an update before even disseminating the initial version. Hence, I found myself in the middle of COVID-19 chaos.
But yes, I finally got ahead of the flow of information enough to publicize COVID-19 admission guidelines throughout our health system. Though in doing so, I could not help but realize the dreadful reality that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would never pay for “prolonged observation” for these patients. My internal dialogue would not turn off. So I quickly retreated to our UM department’s mantra: stay calm, conservative, and compliant. I mustered my reserve and prepared another revision to these guidelines – one more reflective of our UM department’s true north.
I’m fortunate to be part of a large, progressive, not-for-profit health system, wherein leadership upholds high-quality and patient-centric care as being paramount; because of this, the guidelines were amended to emphasize the individuality of each patient’s admission. And on this version – given the frequency of updates to this working document – a disclaimer was added: “remember, UM recommendations may change as COVID-19 response and treatment continues to develop.”
Understanding that our health system’s main source of admissions during the COVID-19 surge is anticipated from SNFs, we devised the following list of admission recommendations:
I would like to tell you that these recommendations are infallible, and we have no UM issues, but, our physician advisors and UM team battle daily to prevent the attending physicians’ temptation to admit everyone, whether COVID-19 + or PUI, as inpatients. So far, these COVID-19 admission guidelines work best for our health system, and help us in our efforts to be compliant. I welcome your use of them also. Please feel free to tailor or dismantle the guidelines, but remember that they are fluid, and I reserve the right to change them due to our new normal: COVID-19 chaos.
EDITOR’S NOTE Day 3 of the federal shutdown continues. This article by Mark Spivey is part of a special section today published by RACmonitor and
As expected, the federal shutdown began early Wednesday morning. What’s unknown is how long it will continue. Neither congressional Republicans nor Democrats appear to be
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
