There are winners and losers in the recently posted proposed rule.
Weighing in at 1,824 pages, the Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) proposed rule for the 2020 fiscal year had something for everyone – and, in some cases, nothing at all.
To the latter point, there’s no doubt that Ronald Hirsch, MD, vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1, RCM and a prominent panelist on Monitor Mondays, was somewhat disappointed when he read the proposed rule from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), released last Tuesday.
“I diligently searched for references to the two-midnight rule or the RACs (Recovery Audit Contractors), or other auditors or rules affecting the Medicare Advantage payer abuses, and found none,” Hirsch told the Monitor Mondays audience. “Boring. But then I looked a bit closer and did find some pretty interesting things.”
“Last week you heard me talk (on Monitor Mondays) about how the readmission reduction program is finally making adjustments to account for a hospital’s (percentage) of patients with Medicare and Medicaid as a surrogate for the social determinants of health (SdoH),” Hirsch said. “That’s a good first step. But in this rule, CMS took a second step: they are proposing to establish Z59.0 homelessness as a CC (complication and comorbidity) in coding.”
Hirsch then reminded the audience about other SDoH authorities prepared to speak to the issue of the Z codes on the broadcast, mentioning Ellen Fink Samnick and Diane Iversen and saying that they, along with himself, have been advocating for getting all of the social determinants coded onto claims – but also noting that the concept was not well-received by some, since it would adversely affect coding productivity with no financial benefit.
“That argument will soon be meritless,” Hirsch said. “Coding homelessness will be worth thousands of dollars in added reimbursement, at least for Medicare patients. But now that CMS has taken the first two steps, they still need to learn to walk by recognizing that many more social determinants influence the cost of care, and establishing them as CCs or even MCCs.”
The proposed rule also makes changes to the wage index, a factor applied to payments to account for the cost of employing staff, according to Hirsch. He said rural hospitals may see a significant boost in their wage index, noting that this is “great, but since this must be budget neutral, for some suburban and urban hospitals this may not be pretty, as their wage index drops.”
Hirsch also noted that CMS is proposing to impose more restrictions on long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) by lowering their payments if they don’t exceed 50 percent of their patients meeting the ICU or ventilator requirement.
“This bodes poorly for patients who need long-term acute care but weren’t in an ICU or on a vent,” Hirsch said. “I’m sad to see CMS deprive these patients of the excellent specialized care they can get in LTACHs.”
For nearly a decade after the late-2000s Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) policy changes, work Relative Value Units (RVUs) felt like a stable
The talk of the industry continues to be Aetna’s new policy regarding payment for inpatient admissions. If you have not heard, Aetna will approve all
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
