Important Tip for Your Coding Team: Focus on Ventilator Coding

Important Tip for Your Coding Team: Focus on Ventilator Coding

Last August, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) reported its findings on a review of certain MS-DRGs that required more than 96 consecutive hours of mechanical ventilation.

A total of 250 claims were sampled, and on 233 of those, the Medicare payments complied with the requirements. That left only 17 where those payments did not comply. For eight of those claims, the incorrect PCS code was assigned; the code for more than 96 hours of ventilation was assigned when the patient did not receive that degree of mechanical ventilation.

For the other nine sampled claims, the incorrect diagnosis code was assigned, or a procedure code was assigned that was not related to mechanical ventilation. For the 17 sampled claims where MS-DRG 207 or 870 was assigned incorrectly, it was determined that $382,032 in overpayments resulted.

The OIG then estimated, based on this sample result, that improper Medicare payments of $79.4 million were paid during the audit period. The report notes that the hospitals confirmed they used the incorrect CM or PCS codes, with incorrect counting of the hours of ventilation received being a factor. 

With the current emphasis on monitoring for improper payments, it seems like a good time to review mechanical ventilation coding issues. Our code options note duration options of less than 24 consecutive hours, which is reported with 5A1935Z; respiratory ventilation, 24-96 consecutive hours, reported with 5A1945Z; and then respiratory ventilation, greater than 96 consecutive hours, reported with 5A1955Z. 

The Coding Clinic from the fourth quarter of 2014 is a good review.  Guidance notes to start counting the duration of mechanical ventilation at either the time of endotracheal intubation (and subsequent initiation of mechanical ventilation) or initiation of mechanical ventilation through a tracheostomy – or at the time of admission, in the case of a patient who was previously intubated or has a tracheostomy and is on mechanical ventilation. For those patients who ultimately receive a tracheostomy following ventilation via endotracheal intubation, the time starts at the beginning of the intubation. 

Coders often get confused on how to time the weaning process from the ventilator – at what point do we stop counting the time? We would include the entire weaning process as time counted toward the correct code assignment. The stop time would be when the patient is extubated, and the mechanical ventilation turned off. This should be clearly documented in the medical record. Make sure coders know where to find this information – it’s not always easy with some electronic health records (EHRs). 

This is a good review topic for your coding team. A focused audit of how coders are assigning mechanical ventilation might be a beneficial exercise.

To ensure consistency and communication between coders on the team, set up a lunch-and-learn session or group chat on how they count ventilation time, making sure everyone is refreshed on the Official Coding Guidelines and applying them consistently.

This clears up confusion and helps build a great coding team. 

Programming note: Listen live today for the Coding Report with Chris Geiger when she joins the Talk Ten Tuesday broadcast at 10 Eastern with Chuck Buck and Angela Comfort.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC

Chris began her health information management career in 1986, working in hospitals and as a consultant. With expertise in ICD-10 coding, audits, and education, she has contributed to compliance reviews and coding programs. She holds a Master's from Washington University, a B.S. from Saint Louis University, and has taught coding at Saint Louis University. Chris is certified in HCC risk-adjusted coding and is active in health management associations.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24