CMS’s IMM sends mixed messages to providers.
The Important Message from Medicare (IMM) has changed significantly in its latest reiteration, and the IMM now must be presented to both Medicare and Medicare Advantage patients, according to Ronald Hirsch, MD, who explained during Monday’s edition of Monitor Mondays that both patient types can call their Quality Improvement Organization(QIO) if they want to appeal their discharge.
Yet, for some reason, according to Hirsch, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) decided, 13 years after the IMM was released, that the form now needs the name and phone number of the Medicare Advantage (MA) plan on it, in case the Medicare Advantage patient misses the deadline to file a QIO appeal.
Hirsch noted that in his area (Kane County, Illinois), 13 insurers offer 40 different plans, and he asked CMS if the exact name of the plan must go on the form (and also which phone number is required to be on the form).
“Only a general carrier name is needed,” responded a CMS representative when queried by Hirsch, who noted during the broadcast that most MA cards have at least three phone numbers on the back – and the web page for the insurer has completely different numbers.
“One case manager in Ohio asked CMS, and CMS replied, “the expectation is only that a usable plan phone number be included, not a specific appeals number,” said Hirsch. “A New York case manager posted that she never found even one insurance company that knew what the patients were talking about when they called for a discharge appeal. Is a phone number considered usable if the person who answers doesn’t know what to do?”
“I have also talked to several hospitals where the registration system prints out the (IMM) when the admission order is placed, but they have no idea if the system can be modified to include the payor name and number, and are afraid to submit a request to IT knowing there is a six-month backlog of projects, (knowing) they’ll be laughed out of the room if they tell them the deadline is March 31.”
Hirsch went on to explain that he voiced his concerns to CMS, telling the agency that he felt its submission for approval was defective because CMS estimated that the changes would impose no additional burden on providers. Hirsch said CMS told him that “we removed more fields from the Important Message from Medicare than we added. This is why there was no net change in burden.”
“So they took off the area for the physician name and hospital information, and they think that balances with having to add the Medicare Advantage plan name and correct phone number?” Hirsch asked. “I don’t think so. Nonetheless, it’s time to get working on your processes.”
Programming Note: Listen to live reports from Dr. Hirsch on Monitor Mondays, 10-10:30 a.m. EST.
For nearly a decade after the late-2000s Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) policy changes, work Relative Value Units (RVUs) felt like a stable
The talk of the industry continues to be Aetna’s new policy regarding payment for inpatient admissions. If you have not heard, Aetna will approve all
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
