You have questions, we have answers.
EDITOR’S NOTE: On Jan. 24, RACmonitor published a special bulletin authored by Dr. Hirsch on the manual changes to the instructions for the delivery of the Important Message from Medicare (IM). There were several outstanding questions which Dr. Hirsch responds and shares with readers.
First, I have to say I so appreciate the staff at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) who work in the beneficiary notice division. They address my questions quickly, although occasionally they answer with that special language that CMS uses that makes you stop and think twice about what they are trying to say.
Now here are the key answers to my questions (paraphrased for clarity).
Question- Does there need to be a discharge order in the chart for the BFCC-QIO to accept the appeal?
Answer- No, there does not need to be a discharge order in the chart when the patient requests an appeal, but the notes should indicate the patient is stable for discharge.
Question- We are required to deliver a second copy of the IM if more than two calendar days have passed since the first issuance. That follow-up copy does not require a signature. Is it sufficient to simply make a copy of the original IM and hand that to the patient, noting in the record that it was provided to the patient?
Answer- You must retain a copy of the follow-up IM that was provided to the patient with a notation on the copy of the date that it was delivered, such as in the Additional Information section. The patient does not need to sign this follow-up copy. It is only if you deliver a “new” IM as the follow-up copy that the patient must sign and date it. In that case, of course, you must retain a copy of this IM.
Question- If you deliver the original or follow-up copy on the day of discharge, we still have to offer four hours for the patient to think about appealing. Are we required to keep the patient four hours before allowing them to leave?
Answer- No, if the patient agrees to the discharge, they do not have to stay the full four hours. You should note that four hours was offered to the patient.
Question- When delivering to a representative via telephone, that person often requests that their copy be left at the bedside and they will retrieve it at the next visit. Is this adequate for delivery to the representative?
Answer- No, if you have to deliver the IM to a representative who is not present, even if you call and verbally explain it, you must still send them a copy via USPS, FedEx, UPS, secure fax or email, and get proof of delivery. You can leave a copy by the bedside but that alone is not enough.
(I wonder… if the representative sends you a selfie of them picking up the copy at the bedside would that be acceptable?)
Question- Patients have until midnight to file a timely appeal but hospital staff trained in delivery of HINNs are not in the hospital at midnight. What do we do?
Answer- If the patient has not appealed when the appropriate staff is close to going home, a completed HINN 12 may be delivered to the patient indicating financial liability will begin the next calendar day. If the patient subsequently files an appeal before midnight, that HINN 12 will be invalid, and liability cannot be shifted to the patient. In that case, the QIO will contact the hospital, request delivery of the DND to the patient, request records, and so on. If the patient appeals after midnight, the appeal is considered untimely. The QIO will accept the appeal and review it. If the QIO rules in favor of the hospital, the patient liability will begin as indicated on the HINN 12.
Programming Note: Listen to Dr. Hirsch every Monday as he makes his rounds on Monitor Mondays at 10 Eastern, sponsored by R1 RCM.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Artificial intelligence was utilized for structural refinement and grammatical editing. All analyses, interpretations, and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of
Now’s the time for to us to schedule those mammograms and colonoscopies we may have been putting off, but it is also a good time
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
