If Dealing in Medicare or Medicaid, Even Private Insurers Must Play by the Rules

If Dealing in Medicare or Medicaid, Even Private Insurers Must Play by the Rules

Providers need to know their appeal rights and be prepared to exercise them.

The other day I read an article about Medicare Advantage (MA) audits. The journalist, bless his heart, is not a lawyer, so I shouldn’t chastise him; however, I believe that all people should understand that Medicare and Medicaid are government-paid health insurance. When you get only a share of your salary when you get paid, you should understand that a portion of your tax dollars is contributing to Medicare and Medicaid health insurance for your fellow Americans, even if you yourself are not on Medicare and Medicaid.

So, when I read an article noting that “the Biden Administration announced a rule Monday cracking down on Medicare private plans that have overcharged the federal government,” I think to myself that Medicare is not a private plan. So, I want to dispose of a common rumor.

When Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS), Optum, UnitedHealthCare (UHC), or whichever private insurer receives a Medicare or Medicaid contract to manage such funds, although these are private entities, when they accept taxpayer money, they become quasi-government contractors. They must follow Medicare and Medicaid law. They cannot act as private payors anymore. But I do not believe that they got the memo.

For example, in North Carolina, we have all these managed care organizations for Medicaid. They are basically private companies that pay their CEOs outlandish salaries, yet they are doing so with our tax dollars. When providers would be accused of owing the managed care organizations (MCOs) money or get terminated from their catchment areas, we would litigate, and the MCOs would argue that “we aren’t state actors, we are private; we can do what we want, when we want, for any reason.”

The answer to this is “no.” MCOs and government contractors cannot do as they please. They must follow the Social Security Act and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and any other regulation germane to Medicare and Medicaid.

When Optum says a provider owes $12 million in overpayments for documentation nitpicking, you have appeal rights. You do not have to present to arbitration like your contract may or may not stipulate. Arbitration is stupid-expensive, and the regulations allow you a less expensive course of action by appealing through the administrative court system. Be it Medicare or Medicaid, either your state or the federal government has administrative processes.

Regardless of what your contract states, if the payor is accepting tax dollars, you may utilize the administrative courts and forego arbitration or mediation.

The beauty of administrative law is that the lawyer you choose does not have to be licensed in the state in which you reside. This is why I have clients in more than 40 states.

The upshot is that MCOs and Medicare contractors like Optum cannot terminate for no reason, even though the contracts say so. Optum cannot dislike a provider for whatever reason and decide to put the provider out of business. Because if you rely on Medicare or Medicaid for revenue, when these quasi-government entities decide to terminate you, you are all of a sudden financially strapped. You may go out of business. The only legal tool available to you at this juncture is to request an injunction to stay the Medicare or Medicaid contractor from terminating you. Because they do not have that authority to willy-nilly terminate you from Medicare or Medicaid.

This infuriates me. I have been successful in obtaining injunctions in multiple states, stopping the arbitrary terminations of providers from government contractors’ contracts. The contracts may state that termination at will is allowed, but government regulations say otherwise. And these private companies that accept taxpayer money must abide by these regulations.

So, next time Optum or an MCO says “you owe $12 million” or “you are terminated from our network,” say “not today,” and get an attorney.

Programming note: Listen to healthcare attorney Knicole Emanuel’s live RAC Report every Monday on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck, 10 Eastern.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Knicole C. Emanuel Esq.

For more than 20 years, Knicole has maintained a health care litigation practice, concentrating on Medicare and Medicaid litigation, health care regulatory compliance, administrative law and regulatory law. Knicole has tried over 2,000 administrative cases in over 30 states and has appeared before multiple states’ medical boards. She has successfully obtained federal injunctions in numerous states, which allowed health care providers to remain in business despite the state or federal laws allegations of health care fraud, abhorrent billings, and data mining. Across the country, Knicole frequently lectures on health care law, the impact of the Affordable Care Act and regulatory compliance for providers, including physicians, home health and hospice, dentists, chiropractors, hospitals and durable medical equipment providers. Knicole is partner at Nelson Mullins and a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Monitor Monday.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24