Are there “Zs” in your spinal fusion coding?
The fiscal year (FY) 2019 ICD-10-PCS updated an area that has not received much attention: Spinal fusion codes.
During the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting in September 2017, the topic of invalid spinal fusion codes was raised. There were spinal fusion codes which included the character “Z” for no device. According to ICD-10-PCS Official Coding and Reporting Guidelines B3.10a – B3.10c, spinal fusions require a device. In response to this observation, 87 ICD-10-PCS codes were deleted because they contained the no device character. These codes did not meet the ICD-10-PCS definitions.
The device “Zs” created another issue. If there was no device, then spinal fusion was not the correct procedure. What procedure codes should have been used to code these cases? How does this error impact the Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRG)? When spinal fusion is assigned, the most frequent MS-DRG is 460 with relative weight (RW) of 4.0375. If the procedure was actually a release of the spinal cord, then the MS-DRG would be 520 with relative weight 1.3141. If the procedure was a reposition of the spinal cord or insertion of internal fixation device without reposition, then the MS-DRG is 517 with relative weight of 1.3809. The relative weights do not sound impactful, but when converted to dollars the impact is astounding.
The average payment for spinal fusion (MS-DRG 460) is $28,882.77 with the average Medicare payment of $24,458.68. According to the National Summary of Inpatient Charge Data by MS-DRGs for FY16, the frequency was 79,495. The total Medicare payment for this MS-DRG is $1,944,342,766.60. Compare this number to the average payment for MS-DRG 520 which is $9,208.77 with the average Medicare payment of $6,944.51. If 10 percent of these cases were incorrectly assigned, then there would be a payback of $139,160,426.84 which is a significant chunk of change. This number is arrived at by taking 10 percent of 79,495 which is 7,945.50 and multiplying it by the difference between $24,458.88 and $6,944.51.
It is important to understand this risk and evaluate your exposure. The first step to identifying your risk is identifying if you have submitted on a claim any of the ICD-10-PCS codes which included no device. You might want to narrow your population by reviewing all claims in the Spinal Fusion MS-DRGs (453 – 460, 471 – 473). The second step is to complete a second review of these cases to determine what the correct ICD-10-PCS code would be for each identified case. The third step is to understand your level of exposure. Identify the total number of cases as well as what is the reimbursement impact of the MS-DRG shift. When you completed that analysis, it is time to contact the compliance officer to determine the best course of action for your facility. In my opinion, it is best to be proactive regarding identified issues.
The last step is to undergo spinal fusion education. The Official ICD-10-PCS Guidelines tell us that the physician is not expected to use the terminology of the classification system. That job belongs to the coders. The coders should understand that all spinal fusions require a device – autograft, allograft, or interbody fusion device. If a device does not exist, then a different root operation should be selected. That selection is dependent on the goal of the operation.
Some different root operations to consider include Reposition, Release, and Insertion. Reposition would address spinal curvatures without the use of graft or interbody fusion device. The surgeon applies force through hooks to make the spinal column straighter. Release is when decompressive laminectomies are performed or other procedures with the goal of releasing pressure on the spinal cord. Insertion would be appropriate when rods and screws are the only devices used for the “fusion.” The rods and screws would be considered Internal Fixation devices.
In summary, determine if you are at risk with the correction to ICD-10-PCS. Educate your coders regarding the correct code assignment for spinal fusion cases – not every documented spinal fusion is actually a spinal fusion in ICD-10-PCS world. Be proactive with any findings by involving the compliance officer.
Find the “Zs” in your old spinal fusions and address them!
Resources:
MS-DRG Definitions Manual FY19:
https://www.cms.gov/ICD10Manual/version36-fullcode-cms/fullcode_cms/P0001.html
https://data.cms.gov/Medicare-Inpatient/National-Summary-of-Inpatient-Charge-Data-by-Medic/us23-4mx2
Program Note:
Listen to Laurie Johnson today on Talk-Ten-Tuesdays at 10 a.m. EST.
Let’s start with some updates. We have all been Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER)-free for quite a while now, but I can
Today, in utilization news, there is a warning to any surgeons who may be reading this – or anyone who works with surgeons. You may
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
