Once a denial is issued, a P2P will no longer be an option.
An astute physician advisor recently brought to my attention a change to the Humana Medicare Advantage peer-to-peer (P2P) process. The announcement (which can be found at this link: https://www.humana.com/provider/support/publications/your-practice-newsletter/peer-review-process-changes) states that effective Aug. 1, a P2P with the “treating healthcare provider” will be requested prior to the plan issuing a medical necessity denial. Once a denial is issued, even if the patient is still hospitalized, a P2P will no longer be an option. At that point, the hospital will be forced to pursue a formal written appeal. Interestingly enough, this change does not apply to the Humana commercial or Medicaid Advantage processes.
Before getting riled up about this, it’s important to reach out to your health system’s contracting team to see what your current contract says. If there is no restriction about which physicians can participate in the P2P, then you can continue to utilize your physician advisors, if you currently do. But beware if the contract states your hospital is obligated to follow policy. If this is the case, you might be stuck with the change.
Looking into this more, I asked members of the community at large if they had any experience with P2Ps before a denial, or payors that only allow treating physicians to participate. Some reported timeline games that frankly sound diabolical. Imagine receiving a call at 3 p.m. notifying you that hospital days or inpatient status is not approved, and that a P2P must be scheduled by the end of the business day, just two hours later? And then, that the P2P must be scheduled by noon the following day or a denial will be issued? This for sure is something you should talk to your contracting office about to confirm it’s a process to which you are beholden.
Another strategy is to track such activity over time and see if you discover any potentially concerning trends that could be brought to your contracting specialists to address. Does an egregious timeline situation escalate toward the end of a quarter? Toward the end of each month? Is the health plan’s medical director actually prepared to discuss specifics of the case during the P2P? Or is he or she simply working from notes sent by an registered nurse (RN) case manager? If you feel you are being flooded with unreasonable denials/P2P requests, these particulars might help you to fight back.
Dr. R. Philip Baker, medical director of case management at Self Regional Healthcare in South Carolina and member of the Board of Directors for the American College of Physician Advisors, shared that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) informed several Medicare Advantage plans that once a denial is issued, the case must transition to a formal appeal and P2P is no longer an option. In some instances, this leads payers to require P2Ps to be scheduled within 24 hours of notification, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they will be scheduled so expediently.
“They can take as long as they like to return your call,” he said. “This is a technicality as to whether they call it a denial or pending denial, but the result should be the same as far as having the opportunity to (have) the discussion.”
Comparisons between treating physicians and physician advisors (or other utilization management physicians) regarding their performance in P2Ps have been made here on RACmonitor before. Often, there are lamentations about how treating physicians are either ill-equipped or uninterested in successfully defending patient status, for obvious reasons.
Treating physicians should be doing just that – treating patients. It’s understandable that attending physicians wish to complete the conversation quickly and move on to caring for their next patient. Dr. Tim Brundage, Certified Clinical Documentation Specialist and medical director for The Brundage Group, suggests preparing treating physicians for P2Ps by providing them a one-page “coaching synopsis” of the patient’s medical necessity to support inpatient status. Also, efforts can be made to include the physician advisor on the call to serve as a real-time support to the attending physician.
Unfortunately, as Day Egusquiza, president of AR Systems, Inc. often says, “where one payor goes…others follow.” So don’t be surprised if other private and managed plans proceed to follow Humana Medicare’s suit in the months to come.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
While the coverage of telehealth is definitely a good thing, it has caused needless confusion. I would like to address a little of that today.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
