If this hospital was targeted by the DOJ, where does that leave everyone else?
Today I have a great mystery to present. Last week the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a $1.88 million False Claims Act settlement with Genesis Medical Center in Davenport, Iowa. In the settlement, the DOJ noted that Genesis “retained Medicare overpayments for inpatient admissions which should have been billed at a lower rate as outpatient or observation services for the period between 2013 and 2016.”
We all know False Claims Act settlements are not uncommon; in fact, on Friday the DOJ announced a $3.2 million settlement with an orthopedic and anesthesia group that was alleged to have conspired to perform surgeries at a surgery center instead of the physician’s office and an $11.5 million settlement with a radiation therapy company which is accused of paying illegal inducements to drive volume.
But what makes the Genesis case stand out is that unlike the other two false claims cases, this case was not initiated by a whistleblower. In fact, there was no indication of what initiated the DOJ investigation, and a spokesperson for the US attorney’s office specifically noted that it was not a whistleblower who initiated the case.
So why did the DOJ go after Genesis Medical Center? My next stop was Google, where I noted another settlement for Genesis for over $53 million, but quickly realized this was a different Genesis; that Genesis was a company that owns and operates nursing facilities and it is clear that they were under investigation for doing a lot of non-compliant things, to have to pay a $53 million settlement.
Then I noted that Genesis Medical Center was in fact audited by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) in 2014 for services provided in 2010 and 2011. Now I was onto something. Genesis must have done really poorly on this audit, so naturally the OIG opened a False Claims Act case.
Well, lo and behold, Genesis did have its inpatient admissions audited. In fact, the OIG must have been concerned, because they audited 283 charts. And how many were determined to be billed improperly? Two. Yes—two out of 283 were improper. In fact, Genesis did well in almost every area audited and they even admitted guilt with every error the OIG found.
So it remains a great mystery as to why Genesis Medical Center was investigated when there was no whistleblower and a recent audit’s results were much, much better than most hospitals’. And it worries me. This 300-bed hospital had an error rate well under 1 percent, and when I look back at other OIG audits of inpatient admissions, I found much larger hospitals with inpatient admission error rates from 25 percent to almost 50 percent.
Until we figure this out, every hospital should ensure its processes to determine patient status are compliant and followed to the letter, because we have no idea how they are picking their targets and who is going to be next.
Program Note
Listen to Dr. Hirsch on Monitor Monday, every Monday, 10-10:30 a.m. EST
I am happy to report that there is no major controversy to report on this week. So let me address issues that came up with
This month, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) – Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. – testified at seven congressional committee
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Breast biopsy procedures may be clinically straightforward but accurately translating them into compliant billing can be anything but. In this focused webcast, Shawn Blackburn, CPC, CPMA, CIC, CRC, CCS-P breaks down how imaging guidance, lesion count, laterality, and payer expectations all impact how these procedures should be reported. Through clear explanations and real-world scenarios, you’ll gain practical insight into aligning clinical workflows with billing requirements, avoiding common pitfalls, and ensuring your documentation supports accurate reimbursement and compliance.
Gain clarity and confidence in OB‑GYN coding with this expert‑led webcast featuring Sherri L. Clayton, RHIT, CSS. You’ll learn how to apply global maternity package rules accurately, select the right CPT codes for procedures and visits, and identify documentation gaps that lead to denials. With practical guidance and real examples, this session helps you strengthen compliance, reduce audit risk, and ensure accurate reimbursement for women’s health services.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Traditional utilization management models can no longer keep pace with regulatory shifts, payer scrutiny, and operational pressures. In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, ACPA-C, introduces an Adaptive Model strategy that modernizes UM through role specialization, technology-driven workflows, and proactive, team-based processes. Attendees will learn how to restructure programs to improve efficiency, strengthen clinical collaboration, and enhance financial performance in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →
Have a Medicare regulation question you’d love Dr. Hirsch to answer? Now is your chance! CLICK HERE to learn more→
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
