The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced a significant shift in its regulatory approach, marking a departure from five decades of practice.
In a policy statement published in the Federal Register, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. declared that the agency would no longer utilize notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures for matters related to agency management, personnel, public property, loans, grants, benefits, or contracts. This decision effectively rescinds the 1971 “Richardson Waiver” and aligns HHS rulemaking with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Under the APA, agencies are generally required to provide notice of proposed rulemaking, allow for public comment, and consider those comments before finalizing regulations. However, the APA includes exemptions for certain categories of agency actions, including those related to internal management, grants, and contracts. The Richardson Waiver, implemented in 1971, voluntarily extended notice-and-comment procedures to these exempted matters within HHS, ensuring greater transparency and public participation in rulemaking.
By rescinding the waiver, HHS will now exercise discretion in determining when public input is sought on policies that fall under the APA’s exemptions. The agency’s new position is that the waiver imposed unnecessary procedural burdens beyond those legally required and was inconsistent with U.S. Supreme Court precedent, specifically the 2015 case Perez v. Mortgage Bankers Association.
For the general public, this policy change could significantly reduce opportunities to provide input on key HHS policies affecting healthcare benefits, grants, and contracts. Many government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, operate under HHS regulations, and modifications to these programs could now be implemented more swiftly, but with less public scrutiny.
One immediate concern is that beneficiaries of federal healthcare programs may have fewer opportunities to voice their opinions on policy changes that directly affect them. Under the previous approach, stakeholders – including patients, healthcare providers, and advocacy groups – could submit comments on proposed rules, influencing final decisions. With the removal of this requirement, HHS has greater latitude to enact policies without external input, raising concerns about transparency and public accountability.
Additionally, healthcare providers who rely on federal grants and contracts may find themselves subject to new policies with little warning or opportunity to shape regulatory frameworks. This could create uncertainty in the healthcare sector, particularly for organizations dependent on government funding.
From an administrative perspective, rescinding the Richardson Waiver could streamline the policymaking process within HHS. By removing the procedural requirement for notice-and-comment on exempt matters, the agency can implement policies more efficiently, reducing delays associated with prolonged public feedback periods.
Supporters of the move argue that this will enable HHS to be more responsive to emerging healthcare challenges, such as public health crises or funding allocations. Agencies will no longer be obligated to undergo lengthy rulemaking procedures for administrative decisions that may need to be implemented quickly.
However, critics warn that the decision could lead to a lack of oversight and increased litigation. While HHS has the discretion to allow for public participation on a case-by-case basis, there is no guarantee that it will do so consistently. The absence of structured public engagement could make regulatory decisions more susceptible to challenges in court, particularly if stakeholders feel excluded from the policymaking process.
The shift also raises legal and constitutional questions about administrative authority and the balance between efficiency and democratic participation. The APA was designed to ensure that agencies do not act arbitrarily or without due consideration of public input.
While the APA allows exemptions for specific types of rules, agencies historically have taken a more inclusive approach to rulemaking to foster legitimacy and trust.
Moreover, the rescission of the Richardson Waiver may set a precedent for other federal agencies to similarly reduce public participation requirements. This could lead to broader regulatory shifts across the government, affecting transparency and the role of public engagement in shaping policies.
The HHS decision to rescind the Richardson Waiver represents a fundamental change in how the agency formulates policies affecting millions of Americans. While the move may improve bureaucratic efficiency, it also raises concerns about reduced transparency, public engagement, and the potential for unintended consequences in healthcare regulation. As HHS moves forward under this new framework, both citizens and policymakers will need to closely monitor its impact on healthcare access, administrative accountability, and government responsiveness.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has recently made a declaration to cease the public comment period for their proposed regulations. By
As you may recall, last week I critiqued a webinar on the two midnight rule. As you will recall it was not pretty. Today I
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Physician queries are essential for accurate documentation and claims data, but they are increasingly scrutinized by payors, leading to denials and revenue leakage. This webcast, led by industry expert Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, provides actionable strategies to craft compliant queries, reduce denials, and enhance revenue integrity. Attendees will gain insights into clinical validation queries, how to avoid common pitfalls, and learn best practices to defend against query denials. Don’t miss this opportunity to refine your query process and protect your organization’s financial health.
Master the complexities of heart failure coding with this expert-led webcast by Emily Montemayor, CCS, CMBCS, COC, CPC, CPMA. Discover strategies to ensure compliance with ICD-10-CM guidelines, documentation integrity, and capture comorbidities like CKD and hypertension. Learn how to resolve coding challenges, improve documentation practices, and submit clean claims to minimize denials and safeguard your organization’s financial health. With practical insights and real-world examples, this session equips you to prevent revenue leakage, enhance compliance, and secure optimal reimbursement—all while supporting better patient outcomes.
Prepare your organization for the 2025 OPPS updates with expert insights from Tiffani Bouchard, CCS, CRCR, a Revenue Integrity Professional with over 30 years of experience. This webcast will address critical challenges in charge capture and coding, providing clarity on APC policies, C-APC packaging, exclusions, and payer-specific requirements. Attendees will learn actionable strategies to ensure compliance, optimize reimbursement, and mitigate risks of claim denials. Gain the knowledge needed to implement updates effectively, educate your team, and maintain seamless revenue cycle operations in the face of evolving OPPS complexities.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.
Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.
The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule brings significant changes to payment rates, coverage, and coding for physician services, impacting practices nationwide. Join Stanley Nachimson, MS., as he provides a comprehensive guide to understanding these updates, offering actionable insights on new Medicare-covered services, revised coding rules, and payment policies effective January 1. Learn how to adapt your practices to maintain compliance, maximize reimbursement, and plan for revenue in 2025. Whether you’re a physician, coder, or financial staff member, this session equips you with the tools to navigate Medicare’s evolving requirements confidently and efficiently.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Copyright © 2025 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
