The media often measures the impact of natural disasters in terms of their comparative costs, including costs to infrastructure and the cost to human life. As we know, weather-related disasters – heat waves, floods, hurricanes, and wildfires, to name a few – are increasing in frequency. In the 1980s, the U.S. experienced a billion-dollar natural disaster once every four months, on average. Now we experience a billion-dollar natural disaster once every three weeks.
What is often not included in the headlines of these disasters is the impact they have on American health and healthcare.
Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released its National Climate Assessment. The report, required by Congress and published every five years, attempts to measure climate change’s impact on the broader American economy. The most recent report is the most comprehensive yet, drawing on the work of nearly 500 experts.
Of particular note, this year’s report dedicated a chapter to the healthcare issues involved with weather-related disasters.
Although the report didn’t make much in the way of national headlines, it paints a dark picture of the changing weather’s impact on our health.
For example, given the disasters we have seen in the past few years, the analysis found increases in heat-related morbidity and mortality, increased exposure to poor air quality, increases in adverse pregnancy outcomes, higher rates of pulmonary, neurological, and cardiovascular diseases, and notably, worsening mental health. The report also found that increased warming allowed infectious diseases such as COVID to spread more widely, with more serious effects.
The report examines each impact of climate change with phrases that reflect the judgment of the authors.
For example, the analysis states with “very high confidence,” that wildfires contribute to premature mortality, asthma, and other health problems. These judgments are followed by multiple statistics in support. As an example, smoke exposure in the U.S. has led up to 9,000 hospital visits a year and up to 30,000 deaths a year.
The report also analyzes how weather-related disasters and hazards disrupt the delivery of healthcare in the country. For instance, nearly 10 percent of hospitals in the country, 10 percent of nursing homes, and 12 percent of pharmacies are at risk of flooding.
The report emphasizes that weather-related disasters and extreme weather have a greater negative impact on the health of lower-income and marginalized populations. Extreme heat can lead to higher rates of illness and death in low-income neighborhoods, which are hotter on average. In fact, underserved neighborhoods can be as much as 12°F hotter during a heatwave than nearby wealthier neighborhoods.
Neighborhoods that are home to racial minorities and low-income people also have the highest flood exposures.
According to one expert, “the research indicates that people who are lower income have more trouble adapting to climate change because adaption comes at a cost.”
The report also takes special note of the mental health impact of extreme weather and weather-related disasters and points to communities like Paradise, California, where people are still dealing with the trauma of their town essentially burning down.
Although the report concludes that things will get worse before they get better, the overall tone is hopeful and positive. For every measured impact of severe weather and weather disasters, the report outlines a mitigating strategy, and lists community and national efforts to combat the effects of natural disasters and the weather.
“If I had an hour to solve a problem, I’d spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and five minutes thinking about solutions,” Einstein was supposed to have said.
HHS’s latest National Climate Assessment is certainly comprehensive in measuring the problem but also spends some time outlining solutions.
Back in June, I was on the Monitor Mondays broadcast discussing the initial momentum within the Trump Administration for a single, national provider directory. Now,
It’s no secret to any of us that there has been quite a bit of recent disagreement between the opposing sides of the political aisle
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
