Senate Democrats pulled off a surprise boycott of Tuesday’s meeting of the Senate Finance Committee, which was originally scheduled to finalize the nomination of Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), President Trump’s pick to helm the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who led the boycott, said in a statement that unanswered questions and misleading statements by Price led to the delay in what was to have been the scheduled confirmation of the nominee. Wyden said that the issue hinged on the fact that Price had earlier testified that he did not receive an exclusive discount on purchases of stock for an Australian biomedical company.
Today’s Committee meeting was expected to result in Price’s confirmation prior to it going to a full Senate vote. With the Democrats having boycotted the session, the meeting will be rescheduled. Ironically, the boycott came on the last day of 2017 open enrollment under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
“Rep. Price has been critical of (the) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI),” Rhonda Taller said in an email to RACmonitor. “(Price) doesn’t like (the) mandatory bundles they (CMS) did for joint replacement and cardiac care.”
Taller also said that the Advancing Care Coordination (ACC) program, managed through episode payment models (EPMs) and the Cardiac Incentive Payment Model Rehab Incentive Payment Program, are among regulations that fall under regulatory freeze announced by President Trump on Monday. This pilot is due to start July 1.
“Most people think CMMI will survive, but may look different (and) have (a) different name and more Congressional oversight,” Taller said. “All the Advanced Alternative Payment Models (A-APM) under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 come today from CMMI, so to get rid of CMMI equates to cutting off the A-APM track under MACRA’s Quality Payment Program (QPP) – or the other track, which is the Merit-based Incentive Program (MIPS).”
Taller says that there is consensus for keeping MACRA, noting that it did eliminate the flawed sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula for reimbursing physicians under Medicare.
“MACRA passed in 2015 with (a) great deal of bipartisan, bicameral support, with Rep. Price voting for the program,” Taller said.
On the other hand, she noted, there is no consensus among Republicans for repealing and replacing the PPACA.
Taller said that different pieces of legislation can be expected to be introduced, noting that already there is a discussion draft authored by Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee. The Walden draft would maintain coverage for preexisting conditions.
“It’s unclear what the final Republican solution will look like,” Taller said.
And so far, there has been no rescheduling of the Senate Finance Committee on the confirmation vote for Price.
What details should the operative report include when billing code 31624? What requirements exist for bronchial alveolar lavage to be coded?
Under what conditions do we report new 2026 code 87494?
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
