EDITOR’S NOTE: Research input for this report was provided by Kate Choi, a junior at Brown University and a current government affairs intern at Zelis.
Many of you may be familiar with the weeks leading up to Match Day when thousands of medical students learn where they will head after graduation for their first job as a physician. This can be an emotionally charged time not only for students but for residency programs, too, as many of them across the country are eagerly waiting to find out who they’ll be bringing on.
Unfortunately, for numerous community health clinics partaking in the federal Teaching Health Center (THC), which is focused on training new physicians under a holistic, community-based approach, the lead-up to Match Day this year was instead filled with disappointment, as these clinics had to refrain from welcoming their share of graduating medical students to their respective residency programs.
The reason? The THC program relies on congressional appropriations for its funding – funding that is currently slated to run out at year’s end and has not yet been allocated by Congress to run past that date.
Programs like THC allow primary care resident physicians to gain extensive, community-based outpatient training, focused on serving patients at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and community health centers in what are considered rural, medically underserved areas of the country.
These programs meet a vital need but are falling victim to a stagnant body of lawmakers.
Our current Congress has continually struggled to pass legislation, especially that which funds various parts of the government. These difficulties were on full display during the second half of 2023 and into the early part of this year. And if things continue down the same path, the THC program is in real trouble.
Now, consider the stark differences in funding for this program versus hospital-focused residency programs. Hospitals received $18 billion in funding this year, while the THC program has a mere $215 million.
This spotlights a longstanding disparity between the healthcare needs of the U.S. population and the hospital-centric medical training that most physicians undergo. Many Americans either aren’t able to afford care in these types of settings or lack access to these types of hospitals, which leads them to seek care at community health clinics.
However, limited funding is preventing enough physicians from being trained in caring for underserved patients, making it challenging to find providers who can or will practice in these settings, as hospital-focused training doesn’t typically prepare new physicians well enough in identifying societal factors at play in patients’ lives, such as those that comprise the complex network of social determinants of health (SDoH).
A recent report published by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) projects that the U.S. will face a significant shortage of up to 86,000 physicians by 2036. The predictions are even worse for rural areas of the country.
Fortunately, graduates of the THC program have demonstrated a high likelihood to practice in medically underserved areas, emphasizing the provision of primary care services.
This subset of new doctors is critical to helping address our physician shortage problems by filling in key gaps across the country, but it is far from enough to solve them. And keep in mind that many past attempts to quell physician shortages and expand physician access in underserved areas have been unsuccessful or ineffective. Meanwhile, we’re also in an election year, when policymakers typically get even less done than usual.
In sum, the current ambiguity surrounding Congress funding certain federal programs is restricting opportunities for freshly graduated physicians to learn what providing primary care is like, using a community-centered approach. Nevertheless, the hope is that long-term financial support for the THC program – and those like it – will emerge soon, so that the underserved can be better served.
About the Author
Kate Choi is a rising junior at Brown University studying Public Health & Social Analysis/Research, who is working as a Government Affairs Intern at Zelis this summer.
For nearly a decade after the late-2000s Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) policy changes, work Relative Value Units (RVUs) felt like a stable
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was originally published Monday, Dec. 8 by RACmonitor as a special bulletin. Many people are still seething mad about Aetna’s devious
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
