Hail the Return of the Three-Midnight Rule

Hail the Return of the Three-Midnight Rule

The Three-Day Rule has returned and it’s causing confusion.

When Medicare was enacted in 1965, the “Three-Midnight Rule” came with it via Section 1861(i) of the Social Security Act and 42 CFR 409.30.  This stipulated that for Medicare to cover services provided in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), the patient required at least three, consecutive midnights of inpatient care in an acute hospital setting. 

However, this rule was waived during the Public Health Emergency (PHE) associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020.  As such, there are thousands of case and utilization managers across the country who are either out of practice with managing this Medicare requirement or have never in their careers had to address it.  That is, until May 11 when the PHE ends.

Via the flexibility under Section 1812(f) of the Social Security Act, one of the waivers associated with the PHE involved the Three-Midnight Rule.  This means statutorily, patients covered by Fee-For-Service (FFS) Medicare have had their SNF stays covered even after an acute hospitalization in Outpatient status with Observation services, an inpatient stay for less than three midnights, or even after being referred to a SNF from their home setting or that of a clinician’s office.  For those who started their careers in case or utilization management in 2020 or later, this has been the norm.  For those who were working long before that, this Three-Midnight Rule may be a vague memory.  As such, let’s review the basics here in preparation for the PHE ending on May 11th.

While CMS refers to a “3-day rule,” the clearer way to conceptualize the rule is to identify the need for three midnights to pass while the patient is in inpatient status.  This removes the need to remember the discharge day doesn’t count and avoids confusion involving patients who spend the first half of a calendar day as Outpatient with Observation services and the second half converted to Inpatient.  As with the “Two-Midnight Rule,” patient status is agnostic to location.  A patient who crosses a midnight with an inpatient status order in place while being cared for in the Emergency Department or an operative recovery room before a bed opens up on a unit, is still considered Inpatient.

Along with SNF coverage, this rule also applies to Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) and other hospitals which utilize “swing beds” – hospital unit beds which are specially identified as appropriate for use in an acute care setting or for post-hospital skilled nursing services.  In these instances, a patient can technically move from acute hospital care to SNF care within the same facility and perhaps even in the same hospital room.  But, without the passage of three midnights in Inpatient status while identified as an acute hospital patient, Medicare will not cover the stay involving SNF care.

Prior to the PHE waiver, there were other situations where the Three-Midnight Rule was not required to be followed, such as certain Shared Savings Program (SSP) participation options and CMS Innovation Center models such as the Next Generation ACO Model, the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model, and the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced Model. However, these programs and models are outside of the scope of this article.

The published reason CMS waived the Rule during the PHE was to provide temporary SNF services to patients experiencing dislocation related to COVID-19 or to those otherwise affected by COVID-19, such as patients whose caregiver was ill or had died.  However, it also aimed to alleviate hospital burden as their units filled with COVID-19 patients.  The idea was to allow a less hindered flow of patients out of hospitals and into SNFs by providing an assurance to the SNFs in regard to payment.  But, from the very start many found this not to be the case as SNFs were not obligated to accept these patients.  Report after report from case/utilization managers across the country emerged that many SNFs chose not to trust the waiver, and continued to insist on accepting only patients with the previously-required three, consecutive inpatient midnights.

What’s going to happen now that the waiver will cease to be?  Essentially, things go back to the way they were, much to the chagrin of those who hoped the pandemic would finally eliminate this rule which many feel is unfair to Medicare beneficiaries. 

You can be sure lobbying efforts will continue to work against the Three Midnight Rule but in the meantime, here’s what you need to understand starting May 11 when the PHE ends:

  • Medicare will cover SNF costs for patients who have passed at least three midnights in an acute hospital setting in Inpatient status and the patient requires skilled services…
    • …for a medical condition which is either related to the hospital stay or was being treated in a SNF before the hospitalization
    • …which must be given by or under the supervision of skilled nursing or therapy staff
    • …which are needed daily
  • If a patient does not immediately transfer to a SNF from the hospital at discharge, they have 30 days to utilize the benefit (e.g., SNF care would be covered if the patient realizes after discharge to home that they do require SNF care)

From a discussion standpoint, it’s important for case/utilization managers to grasp the intricacies of the Rule.  Not only should staff understand these points, but they should educate patients and families, accordingly.  Here are some tricky situations to consider:

  1. A patient has passed two midnights in Inpatient status and medically no longer requires hospital care.
    • If there are no accepting SNFs (within the confines of a reasonable search) resulting in passage of a third Inpatient midnight in the hospital, the Three Midnight Rule has been fulfilled.
    • If there is at least one available SNF but the patient/family does not accept it, instead, requesting a wider search or waiting for another facility to have an open bed resulting in passage of a third Inpatient midnight in the hospital, the Three Midnight Rule has not been fulfilled. 
  2. The issue is not whether a patient can transfer to a SNF for further care, it’s whether Medicare will cover the cost. 
    • If a patient is determined in the hospital to require SNF care but they have not met the qualifications for Medicare to cover the cost, the patient will be responsible for the cost of the SNF care.
    • If the patient elects to remain hospitalized because they do not wish to pay for SNF care but they are also not willing to discharge to home, this could be grounds for issuance of a Hospital Notice of Non-Coverage (HINN) to allow the hospital to charge the patient for continued but medically-unnecessary care in the hospital setting.

If you are in hospital case/utilization management, make sure you are prepared for the re-institution of the Medicare Three-Midnight Rule.  If you are a physician advisor, be proactive and ensure your team is comfortable with this upcoming change. 

REFERENCE:

MLN Fact Sheet from May of 2022 (MLN9730256)
https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/SNF3DayRule-MLN9730256.pdf

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Juliet Ugarte Hopkins, MD, ACPA-C

Juliet B. Ugarte Hopkins, MD, ACPA-C is Chief Medical Officer of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc. and Past President of the American College of Physician Advisors. Dr. Ugarte Hopkins practiced as a pediatric hospitalist for a decade and then developed the physician advisor role for case management, utilization, and clinical documentation at a three-hospital health system where she worked for nearly another decade. She is a member of the MedLearn Media editorial board, author, and national speaker.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Sepsis Sequencing in Focus: From Documentation to Defensible Coding

Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.

March 26, 2026
I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24