Providers need to be proactive when defending against RAC and MAC audits.
The Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program was created through the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 – can you believe it was 20 years ago? It was originally created to detect fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) by reviewing medical records, with the goal of identifying and recovering improper Medicare payments made to healthcare providers. The Medicaid program audits shortly followed.
The RAC program divides the United States into four regions, and includes a fifth region for nationwide Durable Medical Equipment (DME) and Home Health/Hospice (HHE) claims.
Each audit claim contains two components:
I recently received a question from a client. What is the difference between a Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) and a RAC?
A MAC is a private healthcare insurer hired by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to handle and process Medicare Part A and Part B claims or DME claims for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries. MACs also help with audits of claims from home health hospice providers. MAC audits are powerful and intrusive procedures that have the potential to lead to serious federal charges for healthcare entities.
The limit for looking back is a lot longer than that of the RACs. MACs can go back four to six years. If fraud is alleged, the limits could be extended.
A RAC reviews claims and identifies overpayments from Medicare so that CMS and other auditors are able to prevent improper payments in the future. RACs work to uncover instances of fraud within healthcare providers’ billing practices and pursue recoupments if needed. If evidence of fraud or other misconduct is uncovered during a RAC audit, the RAC can refer the matter to other federal agencies, such as the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) for further investigation.
Juxtapose this with MACs, and the lookback period for RACs is only three years. So, if the question is, do they abide by the same rules? The answer is no. Regulations are specific to MACs and RACs.
Providers need to be proactive when preparing and defending against RAC and MAC audits. The list compiled below provides strategies to take when preparing for audits and preventing further federal investigation.
There are several factors that providers need to keep in mind when hiring an attorney for healthcare audits: federal experience, experience dealing with the government, results, teamwork, and commitment. RAC/MAC audits are complex events, with varying requests and deadlines. Hiring an attorney can help strengthen your compliance department when dealing with an ongoing audit. If you receive a negative audit review, you may wish to appeal the finding. The appeal process is time-consuming and highly intricate, demanding the assistance of an attorney. An attorney can also help evaluate the effectiveness of your business’s compliance program and its ability to detect and respond to internal weaknesses.
It is important to recognize the types of audits that are possible, and the different procedures that accompany each. For instance, RAC audits can be automated, semi-automated, or complex. The response the provider develops can vary depending on the type and scope of the particular audit.
CMS websites often post information about the latest changes and news involving RAC and MAC audits. Healthcare providers ought to continuously monitor these websites for updates in audit procedures.
The best evidence is recorded documentation. RACs especially scrutinize a provider’s ability to demonstrate medical “necessity.” Therefore, it is imperative that all practices are properly documented and retained. Personnel should be trained on how to maintain and organize documents. Such information will be a necessity if the provider receives a negative audit review and needs to file an appeal.
The compliance program should be reviewed intermittently and updated as the law and other internal changes dictate. For instance, if changes in Medicare billing requirements are announced, all provider personnel should be informed and trained on such changes. The compliance program should also have detailed policies in place for recording and documenting key company information.
Healthcare fraud is on the rise. To combat the increase in Medicare FWA, CMS works with private contractors to root it out. Providers face a serious risk of recoupment from auditors. MAC and RAC audits collect millions of dollars in overpayments from fraudulent Medicare claims annually.
Medicare audits can lead to additional challenges down the road, including payment suspensions, prevention from working with governmental programs, civil investigative demands, government subpoenas, and sometimes, criminal prosecutions.
It is important for providers to be prepared for these audits. This means taking the first step to retain legal counsel early in the audit process, as well as understand the types of audits and the regulatory environment. As noted, providers must also ensure that their billing practices are properly documented and that they maintain a comprehensive compliance program.
Programming note: Listen to Knicole Emanuel’s RAC Report every Monday on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck at 10 a.m. EST.
A recent analysis of 5 billion claims from a sampling of providers found that total at-risk dollars from payer audits were five times higher in
Well, I gave you all a break from my criticism of insurance company policies and ploys last week, and I had planned to go for
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
