For the first time in my career, I am in the midst of a government investigation that I think reflects terrible policy. And it features the really puzzling position that Congress exempted some conduct from civil monetary penalties, but still wants it prosecuted it under the Anti-Kickback Statute.
The government inquiry involves the legality of a substance use disorder program offering free housing to clients in recovery. This past week, an FBI raid in Minnesota drew attention to this issue, though that is not the situation I am involved in.
If the allegations in the government’s affidavit supporting the warrant are true (never a given), that case is remarkably different from the one I have been working on.
My client has said that as long as their client is actively participating in treatment, and for several weeks after the treatment ends, they will pay a significant subsidy (usually enough to cover rent) at an approved sober home for the client on the theory that clients without a stable place to live are far more likely to suffer a relapse. The logic is supported by considerable research.
Now, this is where things get weird. I recently mentioned the difference between the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Civil Monetary Penalty Provision. A violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute is a felony, while the Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) Provision only involves fines. The CMP Provision prohibits offering a beneficiary anything that is likely to influence their choice of supplier. But Congress included a provision that if something promotes access to care and poses a low risk of harm to patients and federal healthcare programs, it doesn’t violate the CMP law.
The free housing I am describing clearly fits squarely within the exception.
Housing promotes access to care. Multiple insurance companies administering Medicaid payments have given awards for programs like this, demonstrating that the payers are certain it provides a low risk of harm to the program, and housing improves patient safety.
When I made those points to the government, they rejected my arguments. Now, to be fair to them, part of their objection is that they claim the program presents a risk of harm to federal healthcare programs. But given that so many insurance companies like it, that is obviously a red herring. Their main argument is that the remuneration exception in question only applies to the Civil Monetary Penalty Provision, and not to the Anti-Kickback Statute.
A federal court considered this question in the Narco Freedom case in New York. The Court concluded that satisfying the CMP exclusion didn’t provide safety from prosecution under the Anti-Kickback Statute. That seems like a really weird conclusion. It would mean that Congress said, “we want people to do things that promote access to care, and to encourage it, we promise not to fine anyone offering such a program. But remember, while we will not fine you, we might still put you in jail.”
I find it difficult to believe that could possibly be the intent of Congress. It doesn’t make any sense. The facts in Narco Freedom were very damning, resulting in the conclusion that clients were housed in unsafe locations with exposed asbestos, and that many of the clients didn’t even need treatment. The court could have said that the way that particular program operated endangered beneficiaries. I wish the court would have taken that route, rather than suggesting that the exception Congress passed only limited fines, not jail.
Finally, it is worth noting that many states will pay for housing for recovery residences, but the programs can be administratively difficult for clients to navigate quickly. It is hugely ironic that the government would prosecute organizations voluntarily taking on an expense that would otherwise be borne by the state and labelling it “fraud.”
I know that Bruce Springsteen is a national treasure, but I don’t think Congress wants us to be singing, “Well it seems like I’m caught up in your trap again/And it seems like I’ll be wearin’ the same ol’ chains/Good will conquer evil and the truth will set you free/Then I know someday I’ll find the key.”
That is what I’ve been telling my client. As a matter of policy, compassion, and common sense, this is an important fight. I just hope that the powers that be start to recognize the importance of housing people in recovery, and how misguided it is to label a program that insurers have with full knowledge funded and honored as some kind of “fraud.”
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has recently made a declaration to cease the public comment period for their proposed regulations. By
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has announced a significant shift in its regulatory approach, marking a departure from five decades of
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Physician queries are essential for accurate documentation and claims data, but they are increasingly scrutinized by payors, leading to denials and revenue leakage. This webcast, led by industry expert Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, provides actionable strategies to craft compliant queries, reduce denials, and enhance revenue integrity. Attendees will gain insights into clinical validation queries, how to avoid common pitfalls, and learn best practices to defend against query denials. Don’t miss this opportunity to refine your query process and protect your organization’s financial health.
Master the complexities of heart failure coding with this expert-led webcast by Emily Montemayor, CCS, CMBCS, COC, CPC, CPMA. Discover strategies to ensure compliance with ICD-10-CM guidelines, documentation integrity, and capture comorbidities like CKD and hypertension. Learn how to resolve coding challenges, improve documentation practices, and submit clean claims to minimize denials and safeguard your organization’s financial health. With practical insights and real-world examples, this session equips you to prevent revenue leakage, enhance compliance, and secure optimal reimbursement—all while supporting better patient outcomes.
Prepare your organization for the 2025 OPPS updates with expert insights from Tiffani Bouchard, CCS, CRCR, a Revenue Integrity Professional with over 30 years of experience. This webcast will address critical challenges in charge capture and coding, providing clarity on APC policies, C-APC packaging, exclusions, and payer-specific requirements. Attendees will learn actionable strategies to ensure compliance, optimize reimbursement, and mitigate risks of claim denials. Gain the knowledge needed to implement updates effectively, educate your team, and maintain seamless revenue cycle operations in the face of evolving OPPS complexities.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.
Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.
The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule brings significant changes to payment rates, coverage, and coding for physician services, impacting practices nationwide. Join Stanley Nachimson, MS., as he provides a comprehensive guide to understanding these updates, offering actionable insights on new Medicare-covered services, revised coding rules, and payment policies effective January 1. Learn how to adapt your practices to maintain compliance, maximize reimbursement, and plan for revenue in 2025. Whether you’re a physician, coder, or financial staff member, this session equips you with the tools to navigate Medicare’s evolving requirements confidently and efficiently.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Copyright © 2025 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
