For the first time in my career, I am in the midst of a government investigation that I think reflects terrible policy. And it features the really puzzling position that Congress exempted some conduct from civil monetary penalties, but still wants it prosecuted it under the Anti-Kickback Statute.
The government inquiry involves the legality of a substance use disorder program offering free housing to clients in recovery. This past week, an FBI raid in Minnesota drew attention to this issue, though that is not the situation I am involved in.
If the allegations in the government’s affidavit supporting the warrant are true (never a given), that case is remarkably different from the one I have been working on.
My client has said that as long as their client is actively participating in treatment, and for several weeks after the treatment ends, they will pay a significant subsidy (usually enough to cover rent) at an approved sober home for the client on the theory that clients without a stable place to live are far more likely to suffer a relapse. The logic is supported by considerable research.
Now, this is where things get weird. I recently mentioned the difference between the Anti-Kickback Statute and the Civil Monetary Penalty Provision. A violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute is a felony, while the Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) Provision only involves fines. The CMP Provision prohibits offering a beneficiary anything that is likely to influence their choice of supplier. But Congress included a provision that if something promotes access to care and poses a low risk of harm to patients and federal healthcare programs, it doesn’t violate the CMP law.
The free housing I am describing clearly fits squarely within the exception.
Housing promotes access to care. Multiple insurance companies administering Medicaid payments have given awards for programs like this, demonstrating that the payers are certain it provides a low risk of harm to the program, and housing improves patient safety.
When I made those points to the government, they rejected my arguments. Now, to be fair to them, part of their objection is that they claim the program presents a risk of harm to federal healthcare programs. But given that so many insurance companies like it, that is obviously a red herring. Their main argument is that the remuneration exception in question only applies to the Civil Monetary Penalty Provision, and not to the Anti-Kickback Statute.
A federal court considered this question in the Narco Freedom case in New York. The Court concluded that satisfying the CMP exclusion didn’t provide safety from prosecution under the Anti-Kickback Statute. That seems like a really weird conclusion. It would mean that Congress said, “we want people to do things that promote access to care, and to encourage it, we promise not to fine anyone offering such a program. But remember, while we will not fine you, we might still put you in jail.”
I find it difficult to believe that could possibly be the intent of Congress. It doesn’t make any sense. The facts in Narco Freedom were very damning, resulting in the conclusion that clients were housed in unsafe locations with exposed asbestos, and that many of the clients didn’t even need treatment. The court could have said that the way that particular program operated endangered beneficiaries. I wish the court would have taken that route, rather than suggesting that the exception Congress passed only limited fines, not jail.
Finally, it is worth noting that many states will pay for housing for recovery residences, but the programs can be administratively difficult for clients to navigate quickly. It is hugely ironic that the government would prosecute organizations voluntarily taking on an expense that would otherwise be borne by the state and labelling it “fraud.”
I know that Bruce Springsteen is a national treasure, but I don’t think Congress wants us to be singing, “Well it seems like I’m caught up in your trap again/And it seems like I’ll be wearin’ the same ol’ chains/Good will conquer evil and the truth will set you free/Then I know someday I’ll find the key.”
That is what I’ve been telling my client. As a matter of policy, compassion, and common sense, this is an important fight. I just hope that the powers that be start to recognize the importance of housing people in recovery, and how misguided it is to label a program that insurers have with full knowledge funded and honored as some kind of “fraud.”
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
Literature is ripe with classic phrases that seem timelessly apropos. For example, take the partial federal government shutdown. For days, the phrase repeated in the
The Medicare Advantage (MA) program has grown significantly over the past two decades, becoming a popular alternative to traditional Medicare fee-for-service (FFS). As of 2023,
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
