UnitedHealth Group and MEDPAC both reported on the state of emergency departments last week.
Last week, emergency departments (EDs) got some serious national attention.
First, UnitedHealth Group released a study examining costs associated with freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs), and second, there was a call for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to develop formal code selection guidelines for emergency services.
Both news items were reported by Ronald Hirsch, MD during his segment on Monitor Mondays this past Monday.
Emergency departments – both freestanding and hospital-based – treat non-emergent conditions for millions of patients each year at substantially higher prices than physician offices or urgent care centers, according to the report released last week by UnitedHealth Group, “Freestanding Emergency Departments: Treating Common Conditions at Emergency Prices.”
Hirsch, quoting from the report, told audience members that less than 25 percent of such facilities accept incoming ambulances, and they often do not accept Medicare or Medicaid, at least in Texas, where there is a large number of FSEDs. Hirsch said such facilities also tend to be located in metropolitan areas with higher median incomes that are already well-served by hospitals, urgent care centers, and physician offices.
“Their data also indicated that while 8 percent of visits to hospital-based EDs are classified as true emergencies, requiring the care only available in an ED, only 2.3 percent of visits to FSEDs were true emergencies,” Hirsch said. “They (UnitedHealth Group) also report that the costs of these EDs is significantly higher than even hospital-based EDs, with the average cost for a patient with strep throat to be over $2,700, compared with $1,800 in a hospital-based ED and $130 in a doctor’s office.”
In Texas, the average cost of treating common conditions at an FSED ($3,217) is 22 times than that of a physician office ($146) and 19 times more than that of an urgent care center ($167).
As reported here on RACmonitor, major health plans, including UnitedHealth Group and others, have a vested interest in reducing utilization of these FSEDs because of their cost. While the underlying motivation for this study is unknown, it certainly is interesting.
The other ED issue that came up last week has been a topic covered on prior Monitor Mondays broadcasts: the coding and payment of the emergency department facility fee.
“You may recall that the coding for these visits has no official guidelines from Medicare, so it is left to hospitals to develop their own,” Hirsch said. “And apparently, there has been an increase in the number of visits that are coded with higher-level codes, which led the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MEDPAC) to discuss this trend at their meeting last week and to recommend that CMS finally develop formal code selection guidelines.”
“Now, of course, nothing happens quickly, but by 2022, we may actually have a formal guideline,” Hirsch added. “But until then, it remains confusing and subject to interpretation.”
Well, by now I am sure all of you have had plenty of time to read the 1,657 pages of the Outpatient Final Rule, so
It finally happened! The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) finally released the 2026 Outpatient Prospective Payment Final Rule on Friday at 4:15 pm,
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
