Since 2010, a total of 113 rural hospitals have closed in the U.S
Last week I was honored to be the opening keynote for SEACAA 2019; the annual conference for the Southeastern Association of Community Action Agencies. More than 1,000 of these agencies are on the front lines of the social determinants of health (SDoH), advocating for, coordinating, and partnering with populations in need to help ensure they receive necessary non-clinical services. They promote financial self-sufficiency through the following:
The agencies serving rural communities were front and center during the conference, as speakers emphasized the importance of recent studies focused on emergency department closures for these communities, as well as those in other areas impacted by the SDoH.
Rural Hospital Closures
Since 2010, a total of 113 rural hospitals have closed in the U.S., most of these in southern states. Another 430 hospitals are at risk. The ripple effect is unfathomable, leaving patients and their communities without appropriate acute care.
Some of you may have noticed a recent TV commercial. An ambulance crew tears into a hospital ED driveway with a critical patient onboard. They enter a dark, deserted ED space, with their next steps uncertain, although increased mortality risk to the patient is a given.
From 2013 to 2017, rural hospitals closed at nearly double the rate of the previous five years, casualties of decreased reimbursement, increased healthcare costs, and a series of other factors. Appropriate care is now often at least 20 miles away, if not further, in these communities. In sum:
One study conducted through the University of Washington examined 92 rural hospital closures in California. The most prominent impact was the increased morbidity and mortality rate for the populations served, as high as 5.9 percent, due to:
Impact of ED Closures and Openings on Bystander Facilities
Another study funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) provided quite concerning results. The national study was the first to evaluate the impact of ED openings and closures on bystander EDs, looking specifically at outcomes for heart attack patients.
Medicare data from between 2001 to 2013 was pulled that examined treatment and health outcomes for over 1 million patients across 3,720 hospitals; the data included facilities and persons in rural areas. All facilities were affected by the closure or opening of an ED. The primary health outcomes measured were after 30 and 90 days, plus one-year mortality rates. Thirty-day readmissions were also reviewed. Findings included:
The Impact on Women’s Health
Hospital and especially ED closures are impacting patient populations in all communities, particularly those individuals presenting with maternal health issues. The rate at which women die of pregnancy-related complications is 64 percent higher in rural areas compared to urban areas, and has been steadily rising. Over 700 women died within one year of giving birth, one study found,, double the maternal mortality rate of a decade ago. Increasing maternity deserts in cities have become an unhealthy norm.
Black women are disproportionately more likely to die during or after childbirth than white women, with three to four times the risk of mortality. Two wards of Washington, D.C, no longer have any hospitals with obstetric services. Pregnant women who live in these areas must travel as much as an hour or more for maternity care. When a woman has a high-risk pregnancy, or is at risk for premature birth, the outcomes can be often be fatal. More targeted funding, programs, and resources must be available to address these populations.
Programming Note: Follow this continuing story weekly on Monitor Mondays, 10-10:30 a.m. EST for the State of the Social Determinants report.
I am sure everyone agrees that not only is providing healthcare complicated, but so are all the administrative aspects of healthcare. And as a result,
Let me start this article by asking for your help. Flash back to 2013. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) at that time
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
