DOJ Reaches $45 Million False Claims Act Settlement with Specialty Wound Care Providers in Record Time

On Nov. 21, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that Dr. Ameet Vohra and his company, Vohra Wound Physicians Management, one of the nation’s largest providers of specialty wound care for patients in nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), have agreed to pay $45 million to resolve allegations that they submitted false and improper claims to Medicare.

The case began in April, when the United States filed a civil lawsuit under the False Claims Act (FCA) against Vohra and related entities, formally accusing them of a nationwide scheme to defraud Medicare using a systemic program of upcoding and false documentation – repeatedly converting non-surgical or routine wound care (or care not provided at all) into high-paying surgical billings.

For a complex, nationwide FCA case, this matter settled in record time, just over seven months after the complaint was filed, suggesting that regulators may be accelerating enforcement in this space.

The Alleged Scheme

According to the complaint from the DOJ:

Vohra allegedly billed Medicare for surgical excisional debridement procedures – a type of wound-care surgery – even when the care provided did not amount to a surgical debridement, and sometimes when only routine, non-surgical wound management occurred. Additionally:

  • The company reportedly used a proprietary electronic medical record (EMR)/billing software that was programmed to treat essentially every debridement as the high-paying surgical kind, regardless of what the physician actually did.
  • That same EMR system allegedly auto-populated clinical documentation, creating built-in charting templates and billing codes designed to make it appear that surgical, high-reimbursement procedures had been done, even when they had not.
  • On top of that, Vohra is accused of pressuring, training, and financially incentivizing their physicians to perform debridement procedures at nearly every patient visit – maximizing volume, rather than ensuring proper medical necessity.
  • Finally, the complaint alleges that they even misused billing codes for evaluation and management (E&M) services by automatically adding Modifier 25 when billing for surgeries, regardless of whether the provider actually provided a separately identifiable significant service, as Medicare requires – thereby inflating claims.

In addition to paying $45 million, Dr. Vohra and Vohra Wound Physicians Management will also enter into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). Under the agreement, Vohra must implement and maintain a compliance program, conduct risk assessments, and hire an independent review organization to monitor their claims and health-information technology systems.

Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation
Wound Care Fraud is An Enforcement Priority

The Vohra settlement is not an outlier, but instead part of a larger trend. Over the past few years, federal authorities have repeatedly targeted wound-care providers, skin graft/supplement suppliers, and other entities that treat chronic wounds. As I reported on a previous Monitor Mondays podcast, in January, federal prosecutors announced that an Arizona couple had pleaded guilty for orchestrating a huge fraud scheme in which they submitted over $1.2 billion in false and fraudulent claims to Medicare and other federal insurance programs for medically unnecessary skin grafts on elderly and terminally ill patients.

In April 2023, HHS-OIG excluded Dr. Joel Aronowitz and Tower Multi-Specialty Medical Group from Medicare for 15 years – and forced them to pay nearly $24 million – for allegedly submitting improperly billed claims for skin substitute products.

A recent report by HHS-OIG provides helpful context for what might be fueling this alarming pattern. The report found that Medicare Part B spending on skin substitutes soared in 2023–2024, rising to over $10 billion in 2024, up roughly 640 percent from just two years earlier.

The aggressive enforcement and the dramatic growth in skin substitute billing make clear that wound care and skin grafts are now among the top targets for enforcement under the FCA.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Mary Inman, Esq.

Mary Inman is a partner and co-founder of Whistleblower Partners LLP, a law firm dedicated to representing whistleblowers under the various U.S. whistleblower reward programs. Mary and her colleagues have pioneered a series of successful whistleblower cases against prominent health insurers, hospitals, provider groups, and vendors under the False Claims Act alleging manipulation of the risk scores of Medicare Advantage patients. Mary is a recognized expert and frequent author, commentator, and speaker on frauds in the healthcare industry, particularly those exposed by whistleblowers. Mary is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Monitor Monday.

Related Stories

When to Speak Up and Speak Out

Directly contradicting another person can carry the potential to feel antagonistic or rude. But in the realm of compliance, it’s also often necessary. Rules are

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

I022426_SQUARE

Fracture Care Coding: Reduce Denials Through Accurate Coding, Sequencing, and Modifier Use

Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.

February 24, 2026
Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24