By now you may have heard that the Trump Administration has halted external correspondence from government agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It is still too early to know what that really means. So far, I have seen the publication of a few notices in the Federal Register, although no notices from HHS, and last Thursday I sent two questions to a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) department that usually responds quickly – and they have yet to answer.
This may be an issue, as the rollout of the Medicare Change of Status Notice (MCSN) is just over two weeks away, and there are sure to be questions that arise. And speaking of the MCSN, let me add some additional information.
First, I had several providers tell me they contacted their Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) to find out what phone number to put on the form, and the response was “we don’t know what you are talking about.” I checked with CMS, and that was just miscommunication within the QIOs. Both Livanta and Acentra (previously known as Kepro) will be handling these appeals, and Dr. Elizabeth Dunbar, physician advisor for Novant Health, posted that at least for Acentra, she was informed that the phone number is the same number as for inpatient discharge appeals.
I will note that it is a bit worrisome that Acentra will be doing some of these appeals. Why? Well, these appeals are, in essence, short-stay inpatient admission reviews; the QIO will be deciding if the correct admission status was ordered. And when the Two-Midnight Rule was introduced in 2013, CMS had both QIOs doing these audits.
But then CMS gave the contact to Livanta in 2019 to do all short-stay audits. Now, why they stopped allowing Kepro to do these audits was not clear, but what it does mean is that for the last five years, Acentra has had no experience reviewing these cases. I am sure they are fully capable of getting their reviewers up to speed on the rule, but nonetheless, I would hope all of us hold both QIOs accountable for reviewing the patient appeals appropriately.
We have to remember that if you changed a Medicare patient from inpatient to outpatient, your utilization review (UR) committee physician and the attending physician both determined that the change was appropriate. So my expectation is that the QIOs will rule in favor of the hospital in 100 percent of these cases.
And that brings up another issue. What if the QIO determines that inpatient was the correct assignment, and you disagree? Do you object to it and ask for a reconsideration, or do you accept it and take the significantly higher DRG payment and keep quiet? And if the QIO determined that inpatient was correct, is that admission now exempt from any further audits? And if you want to object, what is the appeal process? CMS has laid out the appeal process for patients, but not for providers.
And let me remind you that the way to avoid this whole process is to get the status right for every patient up front. The Two-Midnight Rule is really not that complicated. Let the doctors tell you the patient needs to be hospitalized, and then have utilization staff and physician advisors help determine the right admission status. If you never do a Condition Code 44 change, you will never have to give out a Medicare Change of Status Notice.
I will also mention that there has been discussion about one tactic to avoid having to give out the MCSN: to forego the Condition Code 44 process to change an inpatient to outpatient completely, and simply use the post-discharge self-denial and rebill process, often called the W2 process. This tactic would be completely compliant; there is no regulation requiring the use of the Condition Code 44 process when a patient is inappropriately admitted as inpatient.
But the question you must ask is whether it is the right thing to do. And it is complicated.
To get you thinking, consider these questions. Are you respecting the patient’s right to be informed? Are you delaying cash flow? Are you creating more work for your coding and billing staff? Are you easing the burden on the staff who must execute the Condition Code 44 process? Are you depriving patients of a mandated appeal right?
There is no one right answer, and I will leave you to contemplate that.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
Well, it’s what we’ve all been waiting for… In a late-night move last Wednesday, Nov. 12, President Trump signed the Continuing Appropriations Act (CAA) of
Medicare and Medicaid audits differ in process. Yet one thing remains the same, in practice: the administrative process has become so burdensome that many providers
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
